Member Sign In
Not a member?

A Wired.com user account lets you create, edit and comment on Webmonkey articles. You will also be able to contribute to the Wired How-To Wiki and comment on news stories at Wired.com.


It's fast and free.

Sign in with OpenID
Sign In
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...
Join Webmonkey

Please send me occasional e-mail updates about new features and special offers from Wired/Webmonkey.
Yes No

Please send occasional e-mail offers from Wired/Webmonkey affiliated web sites and publications, and carefully selected companies.
Yes No

I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to Webmonkey's User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...

Retrieve Sign In

Please enter your e-mail address or username below. Your username and password will be sent to the e-mail address you provided us.

or
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...

Welcome to Webmonkey

A private profile page has been created for you.
As a member of Webmonkey, you can now:
  • edit articles
  • add to the code library
  • design and write a tutorial
  • comment on any Webmonkey article
Close
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.

Sign In Information Sent

An e-mail has been sent to the e-mail address registered in this account.
If you cannot find it in your in-box, please check your bulk or junk folders.
Sign In
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.

Digg Relents on DiggBar, But URL Shortening Is Still a Problem

In response to a significant outcry from site owners and search engine experts, news aggregation site Digg says it will change the way its new DiggBar site-framing and URL-shrotening tool works.

Digg says it will be changing the DiggBar’s default behavior so the bar will only appear if you’re logged in to Digg. Also, Digg says it is ensuring Digg URLs will not show up in search engine results. The changes solve the major problem most critics had with the DiggBar, but they don’t address the larger problem of URL shorteners.

URL shorteners are a sort of linkrot apocalypse waiting to happen. TinyURL.com and Bit.ly have been around for a while, but hundreds of other URL shortening services have blossomed recently, thanks to Twitter’s coral reef effect. Should any of these services disappear, all the redirect links contained within go with them.

Then there’s the problem that shortened URLs could lead anywhere ��� a spam site, a phishing site, a porn site, a malware site. Who knows?

Several possible solutions are being discussed, including using an HTML headtag to let webpage authors specify their own short URLs, relying on sites like Twitter and Facebook to implement their own URL shorteners and even the possibility that existing URL shorteners could offer a way to map one’s own domain onto theirs, making it possible to export data and take your short links wherever you wanted.

So far there is no clear winner, though some use of HTML headtags like rel=”short_url” or rev=”canonical” seem to emerging as the most likely solution. However, rev=”canonical” is not only incredibly complicated, but it’s also not part of the HTML 5 spec and seems unlikely to catch on.

It’s possible that Twitter will step up and offer a solution, but if you don’t want to wait, there is a tried and true method of solving the problem — do it yourself.

Building a URL shortening service is relatively simple. You just need a database to store the short and long URLs and a script to access them. If you use Django, there’s already an application ready to go. Ditto for Rails, WordPress and several other popular frameworks and content management systems.

Of course, just because you’re doing it yourself doesn’t mean you’re free of the problems with URL shorteners — you can still end up with a corrupt database, lose a domain name or have your server hijacked. But at least with the DIY method, you’re in control.

See Also:

Post Comment Comments Permalink Print
Reddit Digg

 
Subscribe now

Special Offer For Webmonkey Users

WIRED magazine:
The first word on how technology is changing our world.

Subscribe for just $10 a year