Member Sign In
Not a member?

A Wired.com user account lets you create, edit and comment on Webmonkey articles. You will also be able to contribute to the Wired How-To Wiki and comment on news stories at Wired.com.


It's fast and free.

Sign in with OpenID
Sign In
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...
Join Webmonkey

Please send me occasional e-mail updates about new features and special offers from Wired/Webmonkey.
Yes No

Please send occasional e-mail offers from Wired/Webmonkey affiliated web sites and publications, and carefully selected companies.
Yes No

I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to Webmonkey's User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...

Retrieve Sign In

Please enter your e-mail address or username below. Your username and password will be sent to the e-mail address you provided us.

or
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...

Welcome to Webmonkey

A private profile page has been created for you.
As a member of Webmonkey, you can now:
  • edit articles
  • add to the code library
  • design and write a tutorial
  • comment on any Webmonkey article
Close
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.

Sign In Information Sent

An e-mail has been sent to the e-mail address registered in this account.
If you cannot find it in your in-box, please check your bulk or junk folders.
Sign In
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.

Microsoft’s OOXML Format Receives More Setbacks

Iso
Microsoft has received another couple of setbacks in its bid to control office document formats. Microsoft’s Open Office XML document format has been challenged by a number of international groups.

The International Standards Organization (ISO) will soon begin evaluating the feedback of member countries regarding the proposed spec. Reportedly, Canada, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Malaysia, New Zealand, Norway, Singapore, Sweden and UK are submitting contradictions to OOXML, which may derail a proposed fast track process.

While not directly related to ISO approval, both Texas and Minnesota have recently introduced bills to the state legislature that would mandate the current ISO standard Open Document Format for all government documents. If the bills pass Texas and Minnesota will join Massachusetts and over a dozen countries world wide that have mandated open formats for government documents.

I’d like to point out, since it will inevitably come up in the comments, that these moves have very little to do with office software packages. Microsoft Office 2007 offers a free download of ODF plugins which allow it to read and write most of the ODF formats. If governments of the world want to continue to use MS Office, they can certainly do that. The issue in question here is whether or not Microsoft should have a lock on public document formats.

Governments and businesses alike seem to be slowly waking up to the fact that tying themselves to Microsoft and its document formats puts them at the whim of the Redmond giant. And that is bad for governments, documents and the citizens who need to access those documents.

For those that would like to learn more about the difference between Microsoft’s proposed document format and ODF can start with the Wikipedia article on the subject. Yes that Wikipedia article, which Microsoft infamously attempted to have paid authors edit.

You could also turn directly to Microsoft’s manual on OOXML, but I have to warn you it’s over 6000 pages long. You might feel, as India and some others do, that that’s a bit much. With the possible except of Marcel Proust, no one should ever write 6000 page documents.

Post Comment Comments Permalink Print
Reddit Digg

 
Subscribe now

Special Offer For Webmonkey Users

WIRED magazine:
The first word on how technology is changing our world.

Subscribe for just $10 a year