Member Sign In
Not a member?

A Wired.com user account lets you create, edit and comment on Webmonkey articles. You will also be able to contribute to the Wired How-To Wiki and comment on news stories at Wired.com.


It's fast and free.

Sign in with OpenID
Sign In
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...
Join Webmonkey

Please send me occasional e-mail updates about new features and special offers from Wired/Webmonkey.
Yes No

Please send occasional e-mail offers from Wired/Webmonkey affiliated web sites and publications, and carefully selected companies.
Yes No

I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to Webmonkey's User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...

Retrieve Sign In

Please enter your e-mail address or username below. Your username and password will be sent to the e-mail address you provided us.

or
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...

Welcome to Webmonkey

A private profile page has been created for you.
As a member of Webmonkey, you can now:
  • edit articles
  • add to the code library
  • design and write a tutorial
  • comment on any Webmonkey article
Close
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.

Sign In Information Sent

An e-mail has been sent to the e-mail address registered in this account.
If you cannot find it in your in-box, please check your bulk or junk folders.
Sign In
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.

Microsoft’s Open Letter Whine

Mswhine
Yesterday Microsoft posted an open letter (this “open letter” thing seems to be a catching disease with software companies) regarding OOXML. The letter, which is signed by two MS general managers, Tom Robertson and Jean Paoli, claims that IBM is attempting to slow down the ISO approval process for OOXML.

Those who have been following the ongoing OOXML battle will probably shrug and might even point to the fact that Sun, Novell and an international consortium of countries are also trying to slowdown OOXML’s ISO approval. In fact the only one interested in having OOXML declared an ISO standard is, predictably, Microsoft.

IBM has refused to comment on the Microsoft letter presumably to avoid being drawn into a vendor feud over what is in fact an ISO decision that has nothing to do with IBM.

Ironically, while attempting to point out the benefits of OOXML, Microsoft blows its own cover in the first sentence: “Over the past year, Microsoft has stepped up efforts to identify and meet the interoperability needs of our customers” (emphasis mine). The debate is not about what’s best for users at large but rather the important thing is that Microsoft retain its customer base — even when sowing FUD Microsoft can’t hide its real agenda.

What follows that telling opening sentence is less an impassioned appeal than a whining plea. Former Microsoft Business Development Manager turned blogger, Stephen Walli, calls Microsoft’s letter “professionally embarrassing.”

The doublespeak and hypocrisy is thick over at Redmond. Microsoft seems to have already forgotten the anti-ODF smear campaign it launched back when Massachusetts introduced a bill to mandate ODF for government documents.

First there was the Wiki editing snafu and now this, just how much lower is Microsoft going to sink in its misguided attempt to ramrod OOXML through the ISO process?

It’s a shame Microsoft has chosen the low road because Office 2007 is a great product, its functionality and ease-of-use blow OpenOffice out of the water. What would be ideal would be for Microsoft to embrace the existing standard, ODF, and compete in the market on the the merits of their software rather than the entrapment-through-format approach they seem to be dedicated to today.

Post Comment Comments Permalink Print
Reddit Digg

 
Subscribe now

Special Offer For Webmonkey Users

WIRED magazine:
The first word on how technology is changing our world.

Subscribe for just $10 a year