Member Sign In
Not a member?

A Wired.com user account lets you create, edit and comment on Webmonkey articles. You will also be able to contribute to the Wired How-To Wiki and comment on news stories at Wired.com.


It's fast and free.

Sign in with OpenID
Sign In
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...
Join Webmonkey

Please send me occasional e-mail updates about new features and special offers from Wired/Webmonkey.
Yes No

Please send occasional e-mail offers from Wired/Webmonkey affiliated web sites and publications, and carefully selected companies.
Yes No

I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to Webmonkey's User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...

Retrieve Sign In

Please enter your e-mail address or username below. Your username and password will be sent to the e-mail address you provided us.

or
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...

Welcome to Webmonkey

A private profile page has been created for you.
As a member of Webmonkey, you can now:
  • edit articles
  • add to the code library
  • design and write a tutorial
  • comment on any Webmonkey article
Close
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.

Sign In Information Sent

An e-mail has been sent to the e-mail address registered in this account.
If you cannot find it in your in-box, please check your bulk or junk folders.
Sign In
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.

Open Source Group Gives Its Blessing To New Microsoft Licenses

OsilogoThe Open Source Initiative Board has approved two new licenses submitted by Microsoft saying that the “consensus from the open source community [is] that these licenses satisfied the 10 criteria of the Open Source definition, and should therefore be approved.”

The move may surprise some, given that Microsoft is openly hostile to other open source licenses, but the OSI announcement says that the submission and approval process with Microsoft was “constructive” and that Microsoft “didn’t ask for special treatment and didn’t receive any.”

That doesn’t of course mean that everyone was happy with the decision. The vote was not unanimous and several OSI members have previously expressed their concerns on the site. In a rant posted late this summer, Eric Raymond decries Microsoft’s handling of the OOXML voting process and says that OSI approval the two Microsoft licenses might not be good for the community.

“Despite my previous determination, I find I’m almost ready to recommend that OSI tell Microsoft to ram its licenses up one of its own orifices, even if they are technically OSD compliant.” Raymond writes. “Because what good is it to conform to the letter of OSD if you’re raping its spirit?”

Despite these reservations the OSI has approved the licenses. Interested developers can read through both the Microsoft Reciprocal License (Ms-RL) and the Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL) on the OSI site.

See Also:

Post Comment Comments Permalink Print
Reddit Digg

 
Subscribe now

Special Offer For Webmonkey Users

WIRED magazine:
The first word on how technology is changing our world.

Subscribe for just $10 a year