Member Sign In
Not a member?

A Wired.com user account lets you create, edit and comment on Webmonkey articles. You will also be able to contribute to the Wired How-To Wiki and comment on news stories at Wired.com.


It's fast and free.

Sign in with OpenID
Sign In
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...
Join Webmonkey

Please send me occasional e-mail updates about new features and special offers from Wired/Webmonkey.
Yes No

Please send occasional e-mail offers from Wired/Webmonkey affiliated web sites and publications, and carefully selected companies.
Yes No

I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to Webmonkey's User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...

Retrieve Sign In

Please enter your e-mail address or username below. Your username and password will be sent to the e-mail address you provided us.

or
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...

Welcome to Webmonkey

A private profile page has been created for you.
As a member of Webmonkey, you can now:
  • edit articles
  • add to the code library
  • design and write a tutorial
  • comment on any Webmonkey article
Close
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.

Sign In Information Sent

An e-mail has been sent to the e-mail address registered in this account.
If you cannot find it in your in-box, please check your bulk or junk folders.
Sign In
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.

The Inaccessible Web

Accessibility
Most of the web is off limits to disabled persons. According to a U.N study, conducted by the British technology firm Nomensa, 97 percent of websites fail to meet the minimum level of web accessibility.

The survey looked at 100 popular sites in twenty different countries and tested them against the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, the international guidelines for web accessibility.

While that’s a pretty daunting statistic, and a dismal failure, the survey also outlined many of the problem areas and suggests most would be fairly easy to remedy.

The most common stumbling block was Javascript, which many so-called web 2.0 sites rely on for their graphical wiz-bang features.

Also on the list of common mistakes was a lack of alternative text for images. Screen readers and other assistive devices rely on the alt descriptions in img tags to “show” visually impaired users the graphics on a page.

Another problem the survey touches on was the use of poorly contrasting color combinations, which make Web pages difficult to read for people with visual impairment like color blindness.

Looks like Jakob Nielson needs to write another book.

And the three success stories? The only websites that met all the minimum standards were the German chancellor’s website, the Spanish government website, and the British prime minister’s website. The only question is how those three sites ended up in a list of the internet’s most popular.

And yes we are aware that this very page also also fails to meet the aforementioned standards

Post Comment Comments Permalink Print
Reddit Digg

 
Subscribe now

Special Offer For Webmonkey Users

WIRED magazine:
The first word on how technology is changing our world.

Subscribe for just $10 a year