Member Sign In
Not a member?

A Wired.com user account lets you create, edit and comment on Webmonkey articles. You will also be able to contribute to the Wired How-To Wiki and comment on news stories at Wired.com.


It's fast and free.

Sign in with OpenID
Sign In
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...
Join Webmonkey

Please send me occasional e-mail updates about new features and special offers from Wired/Webmonkey.
Yes No

Please send occasional e-mail offers from Wired/Webmonkey affiliated web sites and publications, and carefully selected companies.
Yes No

I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to Webmonkey's User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...

Retrieve Sign In

Please enter your e-mail address or username below. Your username and password will be sent to the e-mail address you provided us.

or
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...

Welcome to Webmonkey

A private profile page has been created for you.
As a member of Webmonkey, you can now:
  • edit articles
  • add to the code library
  • design and write a tutorial
  • comment on any Webmonkey article
Close
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.

Sign In Information Sent

An e-mail has been sent to the e-mail address registered in this account.
If you cannot find it in your in-box, please check your bulk or junk folders.
Sign In
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.

The Pirate Bay Wants To Ditch BitTorrent

thepiratebay.jpgThe Pirate Bay (TPB) isn’t happy with the fact that BitTorrent Inc. is no longer making additions to the BitTorrent source code entirely open and so TPB is hard at work on a new file sharing protocol that will address many of the shortcomings of BitTorrent.

The new protocol, which will create files with the extension .p2p, will be backward-compatible with .torrent, and yet, somehow, reportedly will be designed to limit the effectiveness of both spammers and anti-piracy organizations.

So far no real details are available and frankly those goals sound mutually exclusive — how do you simultaneously make something more transparent and harder to track?

Perhaps another reason behind the drive for a new sharing protocol is the increasing number of ISPs (here’s looking at you Comcast) blocking Bittorrent traffic, though without seeing the details behind TPB’s protocol, it’s impossible to say if it will be any harder to block or provide any solution for users who find their torrent downloads throttled.

Still, the tradition in the file sharing world is, when the suits show up, ditch it and move on.

If you’d like more details, there’s a wiki page up with an outline of TPB’s proposal and some user suggestions in the edits. Notable suggestions include:

  • Employ Onion Routing (only unless the data being transferred is not recognisable, otherwise use a layer system similar to I2P, plausible deniability only goes so far these days.)
  • Don’t use ‘a layer system similar to I2P’, just use I2P itself. It’s perfect for filesharing, it just needs more users.
  • Include a “robust mode” which sacrifices performance for stability and guaranteed connectivity, overcoming Sandvine and other forms of intentional connection degradation by ISPs.

The other downside to The Pirate Bay’s protocol is that it seems unlikely to be adopted for legitimate uses. While it’s possible, somehow we don’t see Canonical adopting .p2p as a means of Ubuntu distribution. But then again TPB has never been shy about what it stands for and what its user are primarily interested in, TPB has never tried to hide behind the whole “BitTorrent has legitimate uses” defense. Its name does have “pirate” in it afterall.

[via Torrent Freak]

See Also:

Post Comment Comments Permalink Print
Reddit Digg

 
Subscribe now

Special Offer For Webmonkey Users

WIRED magazine:
The first word on how technology is changing our world.

Subscribe for just $10 a year