Member Sign In
Not a member?

A Wired.com user account lets you create, edit and comment on Webmonkey articles. You will also be able to contribute to the Wired How-To Wiki and comment on news stories at Wired.com.


It's fast and free.

Sign in with OpenID
Sign In
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...
Join Webmonkey

Please send me occasional e-mail updates about new features and special offers from Wired/Webmonkey.
Yes No

Please send occasional e-mail offers from Wired/Webmonkey affiliated web sites and publications, and carefully selected companies.
Yes No

I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to Webmonkey's User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...

Retrieve Sign In

Please enter your e-mail address or username below. Your username and password will be sent to the e-mail address you provided us.

or
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...

Welcome to Webmonkey

A private profile page has been created for you.
As a member of Webmonkey, you can now:
  • edit articles
  • add to the code library
  • design and write a tutorial
  • comment on any Webmonkey article
Close
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.

Sign In Information Sent

An e-mail has been sent to the e-mail address registered in this account.
If you cannot find it in your in-box, please check your bulk or junk folders.
Sign In
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.

Why No One is Using Your Application or Website

cartoonapp.jpg

Jakob Nielsen, a longtime authority on web usability published an interesting piece this morning entitled Bridging the DesignerUser Gap. While Nielsen is more thoughtful and persuasive in his argument, the cartoon above (from It’s Just a Bunch of Stuff that Happens) neatly summarizes the piece: simplify.

Nielsen tackles problems that lead to exactly the sort of failures outlined in the cartoon, including recognizing not just the gap between the designer and the intended audience, but how big that gap is.

Most of the software and tools that we love here at Compiler fall into Nielsen’s first category where the designer is the user - open source tools that power most of website’s we all love (though a considerable number of those sites probably fall in this category as well).

As Nielsen puts it:

 

More commonly, designers at this level are core members of the larger target audience. Open software often falls into this category: designed by geeks, for geeks. That’s why Linux, Apache, Perl, and many similar products have been so successful - at least as long as the audience remains a group of technology-obsessed users. Of course, these same products don’t stand a chance of growing their user base to include ordinary humans.

At first glance that last line is quite inflammatory, but it’s also true more often than not. And it goes a long way to explaining the popularity of Ubuntu (I would argue the most usable Linux distro) or why newcomers almost always grok Gnome much faster than KDE.

I don’t think Apache or Perl are particularly interested in making themselves easy for your mom to use, but when you spend all your time working with things as complex as Apache or Perl, sometimes you forget ordinary people and end up with overly complex software.

As it turns out, the average person doesn’t really care that iPhone apps can’t run background processes, so long as the iPhone remains simple and easy to use, which is what drew them to the product in the first place.

In a way it’s the same message that Nielsen’s been preaching for years. If you’re looking to compete with the web’s more popular sites, keep in mind the beauty of simplicity.

Post Comment Comments Permalink Print
Reddit Digg

 
Subscribe now

Special Offer For Webmonkey Users

WIRED magazine:
The first word on how technology is changing our world.

Subscribe for just $10 a year