Member Sign In
Not a member?

A Wired.com user account lets you create, edit and comment on Webmonkey articles. You will also be able to contribute to the Wired How-To Wiki and comment on news stories at Wired.com.


It's fast and free.

Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...
Join Webmonkey

Please send me occasional e-mail updates about new features and special offers from Wired/Webmonkey.
Yes No

Please send occasional e-mail offers from Wired/Webmonkey affiliated web sites and publications, and carefully selected companies.
Yes No

I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to Webmonkey's User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...

Retrieve Sign In

Please enter your e-mail address or username below. Your username and password will be sent to the e-mail address you provided us.

or
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...

Welcome to Webmonkey

A private profile page has been created for you.
As a member of Webmonkey, you can now:
  • edit articles
  • add to the code library
  • design and write a tutorial
  • comment on any Webmonkey article
Close
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.

Sign In Information Sent

An e-mail has been sent to the e-mail address registered in this account.
If you cannot find it in your in-box, please check your bulk or junk folders.
Sign In
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.

Take Webmonkey’s Reader Survey


We here at Webmonkey are curious to know a little bit more about you. Are you a programmer? Have you bought in to webapps hype or are you sticking with the desktop? Are you a Digg person or a Slashdot person? And who does your hair, anyway?

Step up and take our reader survey. We’ll ask you some simple questions — anonymously, of course — about who you are and what sorts of things you like to click on out there on the interwebs.

We promise you’ll receive good vibes of the totally non-hippie variety if you take part. So take a moment and complete our reader survey and make a monkey happy. Thanks!



OpenID Q&A: Plaxo’s Joseph Smarr and John McCrea

After some recent considerable advances in the realm of OpenID, Webmonkey had the chance to chat with two of OpenID’s greatest evangelists and early adopters, Joseph Smarr and John McCrea. Smarr and McCrea are responsible for being among the first to implement OpenID on their online address book site, Plaxo. Together, they try to explain the momentum behind OpenID and how it might lead to even bigger things for the future of the web.

Webmonkey: Studies have shown OpenID’s user experience is really complicated. How is OpenID going to get less complex?

Joseph Smarr: I think there’s sort of two parts. One is, for any given Open ID provider, how does that experience look of signing in. For example, now you can sign into Plaxo using your Google account. That’s a process that’s gotten better over time and is only going to get better.

So when Yahoo announced their OpenID back in January, basically because they really wanted to make sure they didn’t make any security or privacy mistakes, the process was fairly long and cumbersome. But you know, Yahoo has streamlined a lot of that. Google has taken it one step further by actually letting you share information.

Nowhere do you necessarily have to know what OpenID is and what happened. It’s just a standard experience of “Oh, I’m a Gmail user, Plaxo works with that,” Boom, it’s all there.

John McCrea: And worth noting, they didn’t take on the challenge of communicating to the user that there is a URL involved at all, they’re just using their Google account credential.

Smarr: So that’s one area of user experience improvement where we just kinda works for the user and makes sense. Other areas that have been talked about there, one of the things people have been excited about at the UX summit was rather than having a full page redirect, a lot of them are moving to having a lightweight pop-up, kinda how Facebook Connect does it.

Read the full interview.



OpenID Q&A: Interview with Google’s Eric Sachs

As the race for an internet-wide single sign-on standard continues, Google has become the latest party to throw its hat into the ring by adding support for OpenID, along with the accompanying developer tools, to Google Accounts. Webmonkey recently had a chance to chat with Eric Sachs, Google’s project manager behind its effort to incorporate OpenID into its users accounts. In a telephone interview, Sachs discusses Google’s involvement in the open-source project and the challenges OpenID faces in the future.

Webmonkey: You participated in a recent UX summit at Yahoo with representatives of OpenID partners from Yahoo, Microsoft, Facebook, MySpace, Plaxo, AOL and others. What was discussed there?

Eric Sachs: Funny enough, that started off being a very small meeting between ourselves and Yahoo and AOL and MySpace because all of us had heard the same feedback from these mainstream websites. In fact, it came out of an OpenID content advisory council that OpenID board had in New York a few weeks earlier.

We had plan on sitting down and saying “OK we’ve heard this feedback, let’s figure out how to meet it,” but then this was done in the community and a lot of other people heard us and said, “Hey can we come and join?” So from Google’s perspective, we’re making this available as an option to relying parties sites, we still support more traditional mechanisms to get just the URL with say our Blogger Identification Provider (IdP) service, this new IdP we’re offering even offers another option where websites can just request an opaque URL identifier from us if they don’t need an email address from us.

We’re going to give these Relying Partners (RPs) a couple different options and we really want to enable them to experiment and find out what approaches work best. We don’t really feel that we as an identity provider can tell these RPs what approach works best. We really want to help them and work with the community to try and figure out which approaches work best for websites in different categories.

Webmonkey: One way Google’s implementation differs from the traditional OpenID model is an authorization dialog allowing Google to share e-mail information when they log in to other sites. Why is allowing relying partner sites access to user e-mail addresses so important?

Sachs: There are a couple reasons for that. The OpenID content advisory council in New York and the OpenID board pulled together a lot of the OpenID content providers, so this is like Forbes and BBC and a lot of other major magazines and online news sites and said “Hey, you all as web sites have told us that your needs to strongly authenticate users are not particularly high. You might have content that people might pan out and send to someone else. You want pretty decent confidence of the user’s identity to give them access to subscription content.”

So they asked if they would all come and meet with us as the OpenID community, and tell us why aren’t you adopting federated login. Why are the problems with it? and there were three primary areas of feedback they gave us at the meeting. The first was that the user interface that the identity providers had was too complex.

Read the full interview.



OpenID Is Here. Too Bad Users Can’t Figure Out How It Works

Imagine a much friendlier internet, one where you only have to remember one password. A place where it’s easy to keep a tight grip on your personal contact information, deciding which websites have access to it and how much they’re allowed to know about you.

This is the internet we are fast approaching, and OpenID is the central piece of technology that will make it possible. Instead of creating a separate user account, each with its own login and password, for each site you visit, OpenID lets you log in to your favorite website using only your e-mail address or a URL — your blog’s address or your profile page on a social network. Using one of those identifiers, you can log in anywhere on the internet where OpenID is welcome. This saves you the trouble of having to keep track of dozens of accounts and passwords.

Most of us have amassed long lists of separate logins for various websites, so it’s an idea that couldn’t have arrived at a better time. The only problem is, OpenID presents such a big change from the current method of signing into websites, users remain perplexed at how to take advantage of it.

“We’ve spent ten years teaching you to go through a form element, enter your password and go through a registration walkthrough,” says Dan Harrelson of the web design firm Adaptive Path. “OpenID tries to walk away from that burden, from multiple accounts and passwords and all of that stuff. Users have to relearn how to log in.”

For a long time, OpenID was a fringe technology, and few large players supported it. In January 2008, Yahoo and AOL were the first major destination sites to host OpenID accounts. In October, other big names like Google, MySpace, Plaxo, and Microsoft joined as unlikely allies in support of OpenID, bringing the single sign-on account technology to critical mass.

All of a sudden, widespread OpenID adoption is closer than ever. However, the usability problem has engineers and design experts scratching their heads. While the typical internet user probably already has an OpenID account tied to their Google account, AOL name or Yahoo ID, they still don’t know how to use it.

Recent user experience studies by Yahoo and Google showed typical internet users were absolutely befuddled by the OpenID login process. When given the option to log in with a Yahoo or Google account, the user would typically overlook the OpenID options and instead enter their Gmail or Yahoo Mail login and password. The reports concluded users have relied so heavily on a login and password to secure their data for so long, it would take a major re-training effort to change this behavior.

At a recent meeting between OpenID providers and major news outlets in New York, news websites like Forbes.com and the BBC were asked what they perceived as OpenID’s biggest problems. Google’s Eric Sachs, who represented his company at the meeting, says the OpenID providers collected some valuable pieces of feedback.

“The first was that the user interface that the identity providers had was too complex,” Sachs says. “The second thing that those websites said was ‘Hey, we have a very large installed base of users who already log in to us with an e-mail address. We need to provide some user-friendly way to potentially transition them to (OpenID).’”

(Read the full transcript of Webmonkey’s interview with Eric Sachs.)

The “user-friendly” problem is one that has OpenID providers scrambling.

Google and Yahoo are both attempting to retrain users’ login behavior. Yahoo has reduced the number of steps to log in from 12 to two. Google has replaced OpenID’s cryptic URL-based login with one that uses an e-mail address. Both of these methods require the user to “bounce” over to Google or Yahoo for authorization before returning to the site they’re trying to access.

Adaptive Path’s Harrelson doubts this strategy will address user’s concerns or confusion, citing the lack of security a user feels as he is bounced from one site to another and back again.

“(It’s) jarring to be at site X and now I’m at site Y,” he says. “How did I get here and how do I get out of here?”

One company seems to have solved this user experience issue: Facebook. But Facebook is not using OpenID, it’s using Facebook Connect, its own login and account access platform developed internally. Facebook Connect is conceptually very similar to OpenID, but it’s a step or two ahead in terms of user experience. It uses an in-page pop-up containing the login dialog. The user, therefore, never really leaves the page, making the experience almost seamless.

Plaxo vice president of marketing John McCrea, an OpenID proponent who co-hosts a weekly podcast about open web technologies, trumpets Facebook Connect as where OpenID is headed.

“Where we want to get to is an experience that is materially similar to what we see in Facebook Connect today,” McCrea says. “To do that, we really need just a few people who are product design savvy and aware of what the technology can do to sit down, mock it up, and get a general agreement and then go forward. So there are a few things that have to get nailed down, but the general direction is quite clear.”

Representatives from Plaxo, Yahoo, MySpace, Google and Microsoft have considerable resources to spend on this issue. It’s why all of them joined an OpenID user experience working group in October. Surprisingly, Facebook attended the meet-up as well, showing off Facebook Connect’s slick interface.

So, Facebook is on board the OpenID train, but why? If Facebook really has the problem solved with Facebook Connect, why should it bother helping OpenID, a potential competitor?

Joseph Smarr, Plaxo’s chief platform architect and another of OpenID’s most active supporters, credits the collective vision of both projects.

“It’s common to see innovation in a closed ecosystem happen a little bit faster than in the open because you can control it all yourself,” he says. “Of course, when things open up you get so much more collective innovation that it quickly outstrips any one person who attempts to do it all themselves no matter how talented they are.”

“Facebook gets that. I think Facebook sees the web going social. You’re going to have to take your account and your friends with you across the web. I think they are so excited about that vision that they want to get started right away and so they built their own version of it, but they want to make sure that they are able to play in OpenID’s developing ecosystem, too.”

(Read the full transcript of Webmonkey’s interview with Joseph Smarr and John McCrea.)

With all the major providers working aggressively to refine the OpenID experience, progress is skyrocketing. According to Plaxo’s John McCrea, it’s time website owners far and wide hurry up and join the party.

“If it hasn’t been clear until now, it should now be obvious that the curve is accelerating. Now is the time to think ‘How do I become an OpenID partner? How do I take advantage of the biggest sea change since the birth of the web?’”

Facebook failed to respond to interview requests for this story.

See Also:



Twitter’s Election Tools Track Voting Conditions, Voter Opinions

Twitter Vote ReportIt’s election day here in the United States and that means yet another huge test for the Twitter servers — will they hold up under the potentially crushing load of anxious voters tracking election results?

That remains to be seen (we’re optimists, so we say yes), but the site has certainly put a quite a lot of effort into building cool election-tracking tools and so far they appear to be doing just fine.

The Twitter Vote Report, as its name implies, is a tool for voters to share their voting experiences via Twitter. So long as you use the proscribed hashtags, Twitter will collect your posts up with the rest and display them on a map to track any voting issues (long lines, broken machines, etc.) in real time.

The list of suggested hashtags includes: #wait:[minutes], #good or #bad, #[zip code], and #machine or $reg (to report issues with machine or registration problems). So if you wanted to report your four-hour wait in, say, downtown Los Angeles, it would look something like this:

#votereport things are #good in #90013 but there's a line #wait:240

Naturally not everything with the hashtag #votereport is strictly informative, but it’s already possible to see where lines are the longest and which machines might be having problems (just look for the red dots on the Google Map).

if you’re looking for something a little more opinionated, check out Twitter’s Election 2008 page which offers real-time updates and serves a place for Twitterers to share their thoughts about the candidates and issues. There’s even some sidebar links to isolate posts about only a particular presidential/vice-presidential candidate. There’s also some links to the profiles of Newsweek, NPR and other news agencies and political pundits.

Of course Twitter itself isn’t the only source of cool Twitter tools. Probably the coolest external mashup is Twittervision’s election page, which offers the usual Twittervision world- map view, but limits the tweets to election-related posts. Twittervision lets you see not just what you fellow Americans are doing, but also tracks posts from around the globe.

Finally, if you’d like to participate in a mock election, Twitvote is doing just that. Head over to the site and plug in your Twitter credentials to participate.



Webmonkey Staff Shares Fav Feeds

The Google Reader team highlighted its team’s favorite RSS feed subscriptions. Among them, fluffy sites like Cute Overload and gastronomical equivalents Just Bento and The Kitchn (all links go to Reader). Awww, cute.

Personally, I think they’re holding back. Where’s Ajaxian?

We jumped at the chance to share our favorite feeds, so in case you are interested, here is the Webmonkey staff’s favorite feeds:

Some of these feeds are people we know, others are just good sources of information.

What do you read the most? To find out, head to Google Reader and click on the Trends link in the left hand column. You should see the various statistics of your Reader account.

When you’re done, enter your top reader feeds into our widget so the rest of us can get a sense of what Webmonkey readers are reading (other than monkey_bites).

Show predictions that are: hot | new | top-rated or submit your fav feeds.



Submit Your New Site to SXSW Awards

SXSWThe 12th Annual SXSW Web Awards is now accepting submissions. To qualify, your site needs to be brand new or completely redesigned in 2008, and fit into one of these categories. Get to polishing up that site, because the deadline to enter is December 19.

The cost is $25 per site. You can enter in multiple categories, but you have to pay another fee. The entries are judged on visual design, functionality, interactivity, content, and creativity by “industry peers and experts.” To get an idea of what flies with the hip SXSW crowd, check out last year’s finalists.

And if there’s a name on that list that looks familiar, it might be because Wired.com won last year in the Classic category.

See also:



Blog Action Day: Use the Web to Fight Poverty

You may not know October 15 is Blog Action Day, a day when bloggers join hands to discuss a singular topic. This year, the topic is poverty.

To lend a hand to the cause, I wrote up how the web can help end poverty on Wired’s How-To wiki. It talks about how you can lend a hand through community action, contributing microloans to entrepreneurs in need and helping children and adults break out of the circle of poverty.

Opposite of its acronym (BAD), Blog Action Day is actually a good idea. Though if it wasn’t backed by the United Nations, I probably would’ve confused it with any number of online “send to ten of your friends” pyramid scheme emails. In San Francisco, it’s an issue I see every day and feel pretty strongly about. It’s also a tough issue to tackle — one that can only benefit from strong debate.

It’s not too late to join in. If you’ve got a blog, write up some thoughts and share your ideas. If you don’t, contribute to the wiki page or add your voice to comments below.



Take Webmonkey’s Reader Survey

Take our surveyEvery once in a while, we here at Webmonkey like to ask you to tell us a little bit about yourselves. Your thoughts, your fears, your dreams, your deepest secrets.

Not really. We actually just want to know what kinds of things interest you about web development, what software you prefer and what you like to click on. It’s the kind of information that helps us get a better idea of who’s visiting the site, and of course it’s all totally anonymous.

But don’t go thinking it’s a waste of your time — quite the contrary! In fact, if you take the survey, you’ll be filled with such contentment that you’ll be positively beaming for at least a week. It’s true — the Webmonkey reader survey is the greatest mood enhancer known to human kind since the invention of the iPhone.

Won’t you step up and take part? Make yourself heard. The future of your country depends on it.



Are Light Bulbs the Next WiFi?

Smart LED lighting provides wireless connectivity

Boston University wants to create a new wireless technology based on LEDs instead of radio waves. The tiny, powerful lights blink so fast that the eye cannot detect the change, offering the possibility of communicating megabits of data every second.

That’s slow, according to Gadget Lab:

The current 802.11g Wi-Fi standard, which transmits data at rates up to 54 megabits per second. But researchers are aiming the light technology at networking household appliances, such as refrigerators, photo frames or printers — bringing us a step closer to the dream of a wireless household.

The technology requires switching from standard bulbs to LEDs. Then, wherever there is light within line of sight would have a connection to the Internet. Traditional WiFi is able to go through walls, but is subject to interference.

The program has just been launched by the College of Engineering with a grant from the National Science Foundation. So, don’t expect to head into Best Buy for your LED router anytime soon. In fact, a similar concept from 2001 using the flicker of fluorescent lights has yet to see widespread use.

The future of ubiquitous computing will need innovations like this to become a reality. Our iPhone-like devices will need a constant connection. One downside: this could leave those of us who bring our laptops to bed searching for a light to stay connected.

[Drawing by Boston University via Cellular News]

See also: