Member Sign In
Not a member?

A Wired.com user account lets you create, edit and comment on Webmonkey articles. You will also be able to contribute to the Wired How-To Wiki and comment on news stories at Wired.com.


It's fast and free.

Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...
Join Webmonkey

Please send me occasional e-mail updates about new features and special offers from Wired/Webmonkey.
Yes No

Please send occasional e-mail offers from Wired/Webmonkey affiliated web sites and publications, and carefully selected companies.
Yes No

I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to Webmonkey's User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...

Retrieve Sign In

Please enter your e-mail address or username below. Your username and password will be sent to the e-mail address you provided us.

or
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...

Welcome to Webmonkey

A private profile page has been created for you.
As a member of Webmonkey, you can now:
  • edit articles
  • add to the code library
  • design and write a tutorial
  • comment on any Webmonkey article
Close
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.

Sign In Information Sent

An e-mail has been sent to the e-mail address registered in this account.
If you cannot find it in your in-box, please check your bulk or junk folders.
Sign In
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.

Customize Your Search Results Using Google’s New ‘SearchWiki’

google search wikiIf you’ve been wanting a way to tweak Google’s search results to suit your whims, the company is hearing your call — you can now edit and rank Google search results.

SearchWiki, as the new feature is known, appears to be Google’s answer to Wikia Search and Microsoft’s URank, both of which give you ways to interact with search results, ranking them, leaving notes and viewing comments and notes from other users.

The changes you make using Google SearchWiki are stored and will be reflected in repeat searches. So far, however, unlike Wikia Search, SearchWiki does not incorporate your feedback into Google’s ranking system.

As a result, while the new feature may have “wiki” in the name, SearchWiki in fact is more like a public bookmarking system than a wiki.

Given that, at least for now, your input and ranking affects no one but you, adding comments and rearranging search results is perhaps most akin to saving a page on a social bookmarking site like Delicious — others can see that you liked a page (or didn’t) and read any thoughts you want to add.

Right now the new SearchWiki features are only available on select accounts, but should become available to everyone over the next few days. If you’re logged in to Google, look for two new, very small icons next to each search result — there’s an up arrow and plus sign. Click either icon and a pop up will appear telling you about the new features.

Once you click “enable” you can rearrange search results and comment on pages. Other users will be able to see your rankings and comments by clicking the “All notes for this SearchWiki” link at the bottom of the page.

There’s also an option to see all of your own notes and, perhaps most useful, to add a page to the list. As it stands right now SearchWiki seems primarily like a way to customize results for things you frequently search.

For example, a Python programmer might want a Google search for Python to return some quick links to the documentation, the Cheeseshop (don’t ask) and maybe some frequently used Google Code projects, rather than the default results which include things like links to download Python, an xkcd comic and other pages that are not necessarily useful to a developer.

The monumental flaw in that otherwise appealing scenario is that there doesn’t seem to be a way to turn the new features off. That’s a pretty major oversight on Google’s part — what if you customize a page, but then decide you want to see Google’s rankings? The only way to do that is to log out, which is a pain if you’re logged into Gmail or other Google services. Google has violated the number one rule of software development — always have an undo button.

In addition to that oversight, it’s unclear exactly what Google plans to do with SearchWiki in the long run — what about affecting other people’s search results? Obviously that opens up some serious spamming/gaming concerns, but rest assured that Google is, if nothing else, gathering and storing your preference and search tweaks. Will that someday be a part of the page ranking algorithm? It’s impossible to say for sure, but it certainly seems likely.

Also worth noting is that this isn’t an experimental feature, or a beta release — it’s a live feature on one of the most visited pages on the web. That’s a pretty risky move for the normally conservative company.

While the SearchWiki features certainly look useful, the inability to turn them off makes me hesitate to use them. Hopefully Google will correct that oversight in the very near future.

See Also:



Yahoo Improves Its OpenID Support

Yahoo continues to make strides to improve its OpenID implementation. Thursday it announced limited testing for Simple Registration, which supplies profile data once a user logs in with their Yahoo OpenID. Currently it is only testing Plaxo and Jyte.

OpenID sign in screen at Jyte

The experience logging in with Jyte is remarkable. It only takes a few clicks and I’m started using the site. It receives my preferred nickname from Yahoo, so I’m not even asked to fill in anything else.

Plaxo, on the other hand, requires a process that feels like signing up. Requiring info after signing in with OpenID makes moot one of the best things about OpenID for website owners. You can lower the barrier to entry for users by letting them use the site as soon as they arrive from their provider.

To that end, Simple Registration should be able to help solve the double signup issue, assuming sites treat the process like Jyte and not like Plaxo. Other OpenID providers have been sharing user’s profile information, with permission, for some time.

This part of OpenID is important, and it’s good to see one of the big boys on board. Still, it’ll be hard to say OpenID has really made it until I can sign on to Yahoo with any OpenID.

See also:



Zoetrope Project Aims to Archive the Web

The web changes fast, what you see today will be gone tomorrow. That ephemeral nature means that looking at information over time can be very difficult. Google’s new visualization API attempts offer novel ways of looking at data over time, but for the average user, it remains a difficult task.

However, there’s an interesting new tool on the horizon — Zoetrope. Zoetrope is a joint project between Adobe and researchers at the University of Washington and it hopes to make the task of find archived Web information or looking for patterns over time much easier.

The core idea is that, like the Internet Archive, pages are stored in the Zoetrope database and you can then isolate an element in a webpage and see how it looked two years ago, five years ago or more, as well as interacting with it in real time.

For instance, you might isolate a price of an item on Amazon and see how it has changed over time to figure out if the current price is a good deal. Or perhaps you want to see what the top news stories were a year ago — just isolate an element of the New York Times and Zoetrope will offer a slider to travel back in time.

Much of the information Zoetrope appears to offer is accessible through other means, but the Zoetrope interface looks very slick and the ease with which it works moves the idea out of the realm of researchers and into an application that anyone can figure out.

“There are so many ways of finding and manipulating and visualizing data on what we call ‘the today Web’ that it’s kind of amazing that there’s no way to do anything similar to the ephemeral Web,” says Dan Weld, a UW computer science and engineering professor who helped develop Zoetrope.

And unlike Google’s visualization APIs, Weld says Zoetrope is aimed at the casual researcher, “it’s really for anyone who has a question.”

The main stumbling block to Zoetrope is that it currently only archives roughly 1000 sites. Hardly an internet archive, but the engineers behind the project say they’re working on ways to scale the system to encompass the whole web.

So far there doesn’t seem to be an actual download available to play with, but the video above certainly makes Zoetrope look interesting. In addition to the video there’s an announcement on the University of Washington site and a paper from a recent symposium on user interface software and technology, which offer some more technical details.

[via The Register]

See Also:



Will Flagging be Social Media’s 8-Track?

Flag a video on YouTubeSites that depend on user-generated content often also depend on the same users to police the quality by flagging content. Is this flagging a natural expectation of a community, or is it asking too much of our users? Will flagging become yesterday’s technology and the butt of future jokes, like the 8-track cartridge?

According to YouTube, there are 13 hours of video uploaded every minute. The speed at which content is created is obviously beyond the scope where the company could pre-qualify every video. So, users who are logged in can flag videos that are inappropriate. YouTube even explained its flagging policy in a video (embedded below):

“We depend on you, the community, to read and understand our guidelines and flag content that you think violates them.”

Is it a scalable strategy to expect users to not only take the time to flag, but to understand what you consider against the rules? Bradley Horowitz, who has had high positions within Yahoo and Google, wrote almost three years ago about the 10 percent who synthesize content. Certainly, flagging works when enough users are dedicated to the community. It has long been a successful feature of Craigslist.Flagging works today, but the future may bring much better solutions. It could be technology that is better able to automatically filter. Or, the coming identity revolution could bring my reputation from site to site. With the benefit of hindsight, flagging could look like a lot of extra work. And yes, it could look like a relic of less advanced times, like the 8-track cartridges that thrift stores throw out.

See also:



Terms of Service Changes a Wild Goose Chase

Google Maps Terms of ServiceThe Google Geo Developers blog has a friendly heads up that the Google Maps terms of service have changed. Missing from the post is any mention of what actually changed. It points to an apparently-updated FAQ, but it still leaves me scratching my head about the differences.

Since Google has already updated its cached version of the terms, the most recent comparison I can find is this archived version from February. The new terms have twice the word count and a different structure, so my Unix diff command is of little help. Like all terms of service, it is difficult for the average non-lawyer to make much sense of the changes.

The nearby.org.uk blog points out some questionable content license issues that gives Google license to any data you plot on the map. To my untrained eye, it looks similar to the Google Docs section that lets Google publish your content. In that case, Google claimed it needs the right so that it can display your document when you share it with a friend.

In the Maps terms, Google goes further, explaining that it will use the content to improve its local data. In both cases, the company is careful to note that you still “retain copyright and any other rights you already hold in Your Content.”

Googler Ed Parsons explained the content license section line-by-line, which is the sort of help that is probably needed along with the “we updated the TOS” blog posts. Perhaps the changes were too vast for Google to do this for every piece of the new terms.

Only stating that terms have been updated is like telling me that you hid something questionable in my bedroom but you aren’t telling me where. Even if it ends up being innocuous, like a dirty sock, that you even made me wonder is harmful on its own.

See also:



‘Glue’ Toolbar: Your Friends Are in Your Web, Helping You

Social networks connect you to your friends; but so what? So does mass transit. Being connected to your friends is nothing new, but being able to get your friends’ insights even when they aren’t around is new.

For instance, can you visit Amazon to check out a book and see what your friends thought about the same book when they viewed it on Google Books or Wikipedia or any other site? No? then you’re not using Glue, the new toolbar from Adaptive Blue.

The beauty of Glue lies in its simplicity — as you browse the web and check out pages about things that Glue recognizes (books, music, movies, restaurants, etc.), the “Glue Bar” slides down and shows you what your friends thought of the same things, regardless of what site they viewed it on.

glue

There’s no destination site for Glue, it simply lives in your toolbar and pulls from all the social networks you’re already using. The result is the ability to track what your friends like, but only when it’s in context and worth knowing about.

Adaptive Blue has been building software tools with similar functionality for years. Its previous add-on for Firefox, Blue Organizer, exposed links to buy the books, CDs or movies you were reading about on any web page. Glue is replacing Blue Organizer. That’s the right move here — Blue Organizer was the sort of thing only a nerd could love, but this time Adaptive Blue aimed for everyone.

The real appeal of Glue is its ability to connect data across sites. You can look at movie on IMDb and see what your friends thought — even if they happened to look at the movie on Netflix, Rotten Tomatoes or another movie-related site.

To get started with Glue, just download the toolbar. At the moment Glue works wherever Firefox does, but Adaptive Blue is planning to release versions for Internet Explorer, and even the iPhone, in the very near future.

Once Glue is installed, just create and account and sign in; Glue will offer to grab your Facebook profile shot and find your friends if you’d like.

Now, whenever you visit a page that contains something Glue is aware of — a book, album, restaurant, etc. — the Glue Bar will drop down and give you access to your friends’ reviews and opinions. To the left side of the screen are your friends, on the right side you’ll find the last 20 people that visited the page, regardless of whether or not you’re following them.

Glue

Similarily, other Glue users will be able to see your comments and what pages you’ve looked at, though Glue does have its privacy bases covered. You can always delete comments and hide your presence on individual pages, or you can turn on a completely private profile which acts just like similar features on Twitter — users must be approved before they can view your profile or see your comments.

To participate you can either “like” something or add your “two cents” — a short, 140 character, Twitter-like comment. You can also tell Glue to automatically Twitter whatever you put in your two cents.

For more options just click on the object itself in the top left corner of the Glue Bar and you’ll be able to read everyone’s comments, see a summary of the item or choose from the list of “actions.” Actions are dependent on context, but common options include adding the item to your Netflix queue, buying it on Amazon, finding more reviews on other sites and looking for related content on YouTube, Flixster and other networks.

Glue

Glue is the single most useful social networking tool I’ve encountered and using it is actually much simpler than describing what it does. To see Glue in action, check out the video below from Adaptive Blue. You can grab the latest version of Glue from the Mozilla Add-ons website.


Glue Overview from AdaptiveBlue on Vimeo.

See Also:



Make Gorgeous Headlines With Only CSS

Example CSS headline from CoudalYes, you can use JavaScript to embed fonts. You can also use sIFR, which is Flash. But how about using a little creativity and good ol’ CSS?

Ross Johnson has some beautiful examples of CSS headlines and more, including code.

If you aren’t naturally a type nerd, you may be surprised that the Coudal Partners headline font is bolded, condensed, but otherwise normal Times New Roman. As the examples show, there are tons of ways to change how a font looks while sticking to the standard set of cross-platform faces.

See also:



Image Types Duke Out Over Quality And File Size

PNG vs JPGThe age-old image type debate is going on over at Reddit. What used to be mostly JPG versus GIF now puts JPG up against PNG.

Yahoo’s Stoyan Stefanov recently had a series on image optimization. His breakdown on page weight was particularly fascinating. Google’s home page is 75% image, weight-wise, because there’s very little to it besides the logo and search box.

Stefanov also posted a good run-down on file types, which is less snarky than the opinionated-but-useful Reddit thread. But for quick fun, see the image type comic that the Reddit folks are discussing.

While I love PNG for its clarity, I often end up choosing JPG for screenshots on Webmonkey because of size. PNG is often 10x the JPG version, with little loss in quality.

But aren’t we all on broadband now? According to a recent study, no. Just over half of Americans have home broadband connections. However, another study shows that 90% of active users have fast connections.

That said, Mobile use is expected to increase, and its speeds are not nearly up with broadband. Plus, if you’re serving bigger images from your own server, you have to pay for that bandwidth, which can add up with significant traffic. All this means image optimization is still relevant, even when many do have access to fast connections.

See also:



Google Reader’s New Translate Feature Helps Overcome Language Barriers

google reader translateIt’s easy to forget, especially in the U.S.-centric tech press, that its called the world wide web for a reason — there’s a ton of content from around the globe. The problem is that a lot of that content may not be written in your native language. This being the 21st Century and all, Google has decided that there should be an easy way to follow non-native language sites.

To help you out, the company has just rolled out a new feature for its RSS feed reader aimed at overcoming the language barrier — Google Reader now offers automatic translation of RSS feeds. Once a feed is added to Google Reader, click the Feed Settings menu and you’ll notice a new option “Translate into my language.”

The heavy lifting is done by Google Translate and of course that service has its issues. Don’t expect perfect translations, but Translate does well enough to let you get the gist of a post.

While the new features are a great addition to Google Reader, they don’t solve the basic problem of finding good sites in foreign languages. If you have some favorite sites written in something other than English, be sure to share them in comments below.

[via Google Operating System]

See Also:



BlueTrip: CSS Framework Combines the Best of Several Worlds

bluetripLove them or hate them, there’s no denying that CSS frameworks are here to stay. Frameworks make rapidly sketching out a website design much easier by handling lots of boilerplate tasks for you — positioning elements, setting typography defaults and more.

A relative newcomer that’s quickly earned a place our media servers is BlueTrip, which combines the best elements of two other frameworks Blueprint and Tripoli and combines them to create a new one (hence the name).

BlueTrip is the brainchild of a designer/blogger by the name of Mike who runs Capsize Designs. Although you can grab a copy from his site, BlueTrip recently moved to a more permanent home at bluetrip.org, which is alredy up and running in limited form.

While BlueTrip is a nice framework in its own right, one of the things we really like about it is that it exemplifies the best way to use CSS frameworks — take the elements that prove helpful and ditch the rest.

In this case BlueTrip takes the grid layout tools of BluePrint and the typography tools of Tripoli and ignores the rest.

Of course critics point out that frameworks often add semantically unnecessary class names and encourage otherwise useless wrapper divs and more. Worse, frameworks can be bulky and hurt your page load times.

Still, at least for the prototyping stage, we find frameworks to be an invaluable tool in the web designer’s toolbox. And BlueTrip is a great example of how good designers use frameworks.

For a more in depth look at the CSS framework debate and some links to other frameworks be sure to check out our previous coverage.

See Also: