Member Sign In
Not a member?

A Wired.com user account lets you create, edit and comment on Webmonkey articles. You will also be able to contribute to the Wired How-To Wiki and comment on news stories at Wired.com.


It's fast and free.

Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...
Join Webmonkey

Please send me occasional e-mail updates about new features and special offers from Wired/Webmonkey.
Yes No

Please send occasional e-mail offers from Wired/Webmonkey affiliated web sites and publications, and carefully selected companies.
Yes No

I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to Webmonkey's User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...

Retrieve Sign In

Please enter your e-mail address or username below. Your username and password will be sent to the e-mail address you provided us.

or
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.
processing...

Welcome to Webmonkey

A private profile page has been created for you.
As a member of Webmonkey, you can now:
  • edit articles
  • add to the code library
  • design and write a tutorial
  • comment on any Webmonkey article
Close
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.

Sign In Information Sent

An e-mail has been sent to the e-mail address registered in this account.
If you cannot find it in your in-box, please check your bulk or junk folders.
Sign In
Webmonkey is a property of Wired Digital.

Blog Action Day: Use the Web to Fight Poverty

You may not know October 15 is Blog Action Day, a day when bloggers join hands to discuss a singular topic. This year, the topic is poverty.

To lend a hand to the cause, I wrote up how the web can help end poverty on Wired’s How-To wiki. It talks about how you can lend a hand through community action, contributing microloans to entrepreneurs in need and helping children and adults break out of the circle of poverty.

Opposite of its acronym (BAD), Blog Action Day is actually a good idea. Though if it wasn’t backed by the United Nations, I probably would’ve confused it with any number of online “send to ten of your friends” pyramid scheme emails. In San Francisco, it’s an issue I see every day and feel pretty strongly about. It’s also a tough issue to tackle — one that can only benefit from strong debate.

It’s not too late to join in. If you’ve got a blog, write up some thoughts and share your ideas. If you don’t, contribute to the wiki page or add your voice to comments below.



Yahoo Users Befuddled by OpenID

Yahoo OpenID FAILYahoo just released results of an OpenID usability study. Though there’s a silver lining, the news is mostly not good. Although we’re big fans of OpenID, it’s definitely not yet ready for mainstream adoption.

The study observed nine female Yahoo users in their thirties who considered themselves of medium-to-high internet savvy. The participants were told they could log in with their Yahoo ID at a third-party site. In many cases, the users tried to log in using the site’s main login, rather than the OpenID login. Users don’t understand multiple ways to log in, at least not without some education.

Unfortunately, the problems continue even when the user knows about OpenID. The module which lists popular providers, including Yahoo, confused users. There is no spot for a password, which seems strange to even advanced users (though this is becoming more popular with financial sites for security). Then comes Yahoo’s OpenID process, which is confusing for users that haven’t already added OpenID to their Yahoo account.

They’re pretty sobering results. The Developer Network also summarized the study and offers suggestions to third-party sites.

So, where’s that silver lining? The users saw the utility of OpenID:

  • “It’s convenient. You don’t have to give your whole life history to a site.”
  • “It’s easier because you don’t have to create a new ID and password.”
  • It eliminates the need for email verification.

Even better, the study’s very existence shows that Yahoo is thinking about it. For OpenID to succeed on a grand scale, it’s going to take big players on the web making it understandable to the masses.

See also:



MacHeads Film to Explore the ‘Cult of Mac’

There’s a new trailer for the coming film MacHeads making the internet rounds today. The film, which so far doesn’t have a release date, looks sort of like Trekkies, but focuses on the “cult of Mac” rather than the cult of Star Trek. The trailer doesn’t give many hints as to what the film is about, but we have no doubt that many a Mac fan will be at least momentarily entranced.

Given that PCs currently outnumber Macs two to one in my household, I don’t think I qualify as a Mac head (though OS X is running on one of those PCs so many that makes up for it). That said, even I will admit there’s something strangely compelling about Apple, Steve Jobs and the whole aura of Macs.

Whether you find Mac fans annoying pedants or you’re happily draining the Kool-Aid from Steve’s over-sized sippy cup, there’s no denying that Apple and its fans have a significant impact on the web and tech culture in general.

Will we fork out $12 to see MacHeads? Nah, we’ll just wait until it hits the iTunes Store.

[Trivia note: Wired’s resident Mac expert Leander Kahney (founder of the Cult of Mac blog and author of several books on Apple) makes an appearance in the trailer.]



Flash Player 10 Promises Better Web Video

FlashiconCreative Suite 4 isn’t the only new arrival from Adobe, the company has also released the final version of its Flash 10 plugin. Frankly we’ve been using the Flash 10 beta for so long we forgot it was a beta, but if you’ve been waiting for the final release, today’s your day.

Flash 10 packs in a slew of new features including native 3-D transformations and animation, improved support for custom filters and, most notable for those of you drooling over the new MacBooks, GPU hardware acceleration.

Designers are probably most excited about the new text engine which offers much better font rendering and there have also been some long-awaited improvements to audio handling in Flash.

For a more detailed rundown on everything that’s new in Flash 10, have a look at our review of the beta. Not a whole lot has changed since then, though naturally the bugs have been ironed out.

To upgrade to Flash 10, you’ll need to visit the Adobe Flash download page.

See Also:



Adobe Creative Suite 4 Now Available

CS4 boxAdobe has announced the arrival of Creative Suite 4, the latest upgrade to its line of professional graphics and video editing applications. CS4 includes updated versions of Photoshop, Illustrator, Flash, Dreamweaver, Fireworks, InDesign, Contribute, After Effects, Premiere Pro, Soundbooth, OnLocation, and Encore.

There are four different flavors of the suite are available, with prices ranging from $1,700 to $2,500 for the Master Collection which includes all the above. Naturally you can purchase apps individually as well.

Be sure to check out our review of Photoshop CS 4 and the other web developer related tools like Dreamweaver, Flash and more.

To get your copy head to the Adobe Store.

See Also:



First Look: Firefox 3.1 Beta Offers Speed, Better Searching and More

beta1 logoAs we mentioned Tuesday, the first beta release of the new Firefox 3.1 browser has arrived. Firefox 3.1, which will land in final form near the beginning of 2009, promises speed improvements, a more refined search bar and support for new and emerging web standards. The browser will also contain a slew of small features that didn’t make the cut in Firefox 3.0.

While not all of the improvements are in beta 1, there’s enough to whet your appetite for the final release.

Probably the most anticipated change coming in Firefox 3.1 is the new TraceMonkey JavaScript optimization engine, which should improve the speed of Ajax-heavy web apps. If you downloaded the beta you may be wondering where the performance boost is — out of the box, Firefox 3.1 beta 1 feels much the same as Firefox 3.0.

The answer is that TraceMonkey is still considered unstable and is turned off by default. To enable it, you’ll need to type about:config in the URL bar and then search for the javascript.options.jit.content setting. Change that setting to true and restart Firefox.

However, even after enabling TraceMonkey, we still didn’t see a huge speed difference. Sites like Gmail, Google Reader, the Zoho suite and other JavaScript-intensive apps were moderately faster, but not enough to give to inspire a forehead-smacking “wow.” Of course this is only the first beta, and we remain optimistic about TraceMonkey. Hopefully future releases will show a more marked speed boost.

If you’ve been playing around with the recently released Geode geolocation add-on for Firefox 3.0, you’ll be happy to know that the same API is baked into the first beta of Firefox 3.1. The beta implements it a little differently, but the same W3C-sanctioned Geo API is used behind the scenes.

As the Mozilla developer blog explains:

People who want to try out Geolocation in Beta 1 can install Doug Turner’s Geolocation add-on which adds a fixed Geolocation provider. Once you’ve installed it you can visit p to get your location and update the preference in Tools -> Add-ons -> Geolocation with your latitude and longitude. There are a number of examples of the API you can try on the Geode Labs Welcome page.

If geolocation services aren’t your bag, fear not. Firefox 3.1 offers several user interface improvements that promise to improve your day-to-day web browsing experience in very tangible ways.

The most obvious improvement in the Firefox 3.1 UI is the new tab switching behavior. The tab switcher now offers a page preview, which makes finding the tab you’re looking for somewhat easier. To see it in action, hit the keyboard shortcut Alt-Tab (Ctrl-Tab on the Mac).

tab switcher

It’s worth noting that tab switcher is nonlinear; it flips through the most recently viewed tabs in order, rather than simply moving from left to right across the window. Some will no doubt prefer it this way, but it does take a little while to get used to if you’re expecting the other behavior.

Also improved in Firefox 3.1 is the ability to drag a tab to a new window. In current versions of Firefox, dragging a tab to a new window will create a new tab in that window and then reload the tab. In the beta, the tab simply moves to the new window, no reload required.

Another significant improvement to the Firefox UI is the new support for wild card characters in the URL search bar (also known as the “awesome bar”). As we outlined in a previous post, the awesome bar now allows for special modifiers to narrow or expand your search results.

url barIt’s also worth noting that the you can permanently exclude sites from awesome bar searches by tinkering with the settings in about:config. The blacklisting capabilities should help eliminate some privacy concerns and ensure that your friends won’t discover you’ve been secretly watching the new 90210 when they borrow your laptop for a quick e-mail check.

Web developers will be happy to know that Firefox 3.1 has a number of HTML 5 improvements including support for the <audio> and <video> tags, which promise to make embedding media somewhat easier. These containers can display Ogg Theora encoded videos or play back Ogg Vorbis encoded audio, so you’ll be able to feature movies and music on your pages without a plug-in.

There are also some new CSS selectors included, like support for the @font-face rule, which gives designers a bit more control over a site’s typography. Using the @font-face declaration, web designers can specify true-type fonts and escape the tyranny of Arial, Times New Roman and the other “big five” fonts that dominate the web. [Note that @font-face support works in Windows and Mac, but not Linux for beta 1. Linux support will arrive before the final release.]

Firefox 3.1 also supports CSS transformations and SVG effects for HTML elements, meaning you can blur, rotate, scale and perform other transformations on page elements with only a couple lines of CSS.

What’s missing? The private browsing feature (aka “porn mode) isn’t in this release, though we expect it in the future. Also, the tab-specific selective session restore dialog isn’t fully developed yet, so we’re waiting on that feature as well.

Firefox 3.1 is obviously still a beta release, and we don’t recommend ditching Firefox 3.0 just yet. If nothing else, very few add-ons have been updated (of our dozen or so “must-haves”, only NoScript works with the 3.1 beta), but beta 1 is definitely worth a test drive to see much of what’s in store for the final release. It’s still a bit rough around the edges, but Firefox 3.1 is shaping up to be a very nice upgrade once the polished version arrives.

See Also:



Mint’s New Investment Graphs Showcase Personal Recessions

Down and to the right

I don’t know much about finances, but the latest headlines suggest I should take a look at them anyway (something about a financial crisis? What now?). News about Mint.com’s new financial analysis features came across my desk Monday, so I bit the bullet and took the opportunity to check out the popular financial planning website.

Mint.com is an award-winning website you can use to track your finances. It’s got an Ajax-heavy interface with lots of graphs and visualization tools. The new features added to the site Monday include a new graphing tool that allows you to see all of your financial investments in one place and compare them to data points depicting the performance of the S&P 500, Dow Jones and other sorely depressing indexes. Another new chart shows how your assets are allocated.

That’s what’s new. What I’ve been missing is trending graphs and plenty of information to tell me where I should or should not be spending my money. Information from your bank accounts is automatically uploaded, and spending is automatically categorized. For example, it somehow knows how much I spent on food and can compare it to other people across the nation. It also told me my credit card’s APR sucks and I should get a new one.

The interface is sleek, easy to use and full of Web 2.0-friendly Ajax and big search boxes with buttons. The site even congratulates you when you successfully fill out those big search boxes with a nice green “OK” and “good password” in encouragement of your literacy  …or e-mail uniqueness and knowledge of safe passwords. Whatever.

The graphs are intuitive and insightful. Too insightful, if you ask me. As I started uploading my accounts, the site felt compelled to explain to me that I spend too much money on Starbucks coffee. Back off my caffeine addiction, website. I can quit at any time.

Alas, the newspaper headlines were true. As suggested in newspapers all over the country, the graphs of my finances showed a lot of down and to the right action. What struck me was how easy it was to upload my financial information.

What has kept me from using the service up until now was it felt like I was uploading all of my financial information to Jamba Juice — with a name like Mint, it reminds me more of my favorite ice cream flavor than something trustworthy like a bank. After a look at the SSL encryption information, security certificates and the site’s privacy policy, I decided this web startup out of nowhere is worthy of all of my financial information, logins and passwords. Why not?

The graphs were very nicely drawn, and power of suggestion had me tasting mint thanks to the logo. In the end, I couldn’t help but feel good about being worth one or two hundred cup o’ joes poorer. Easy come, easy go, right? The software is definitely worth checking out if you can get past the unsettling online privacy trust issues. I admit, it got me taking a serious look at my finances in a fun way, and that’s something I never thought I would say.

See Also:



Firefox 3.1 Beta 1 Arrives

It’s here, folks. The first beta release of the next major version of the Firefox web browser is available for download.

Grab the packages for all major operating systems and most major languages at Mozilla.com. Keep in mind that this update is meant only for testers and early adopters. Another beta is expected later this year with the final browser code shipping in early 2009.

Check back later for a full review on the Webmonkey blog. We’ll be posting our impressions as soon as we’ve had a chance to give the new browser a spin.

Version 3 was a major milestone for Firefox, addressing a multitude of issues related to performance and bloat, usability and application design, and a complete re-write of several components beneath the hood.

So what does that leave for Firefox 3.1? Quite a bit, actually. As we’ve covered in the past, this version of Firefox will show off some substantial performance tweaks, thanks to improvements to the Gecko layout engine and the inclusion of the new TraceMonkey JavaScript engine. There’s also better support for new and emerging web standards, like CSS 2.1 and CSS 3 and the <video> and <audio> tags proposed for HTML 5. The team has also squeezed in some stuff that was cut from Firefox 3 due to time constraints.

Here’s a list of the top new features you’ll see in Firefox 3.1 Beta 1. We cribbed some items on this list from Mozilla’s site and added the rest based on our own fact-finding. For the full rundown on new features, check the Mozilla Developer site.

Key New Features:

  • Improvements to the Gecko layout engine
  • Beta 1 includes TraceMonkey, Mozilla’s next-gen (and supposedly really fast) JavaScript engine
  • Added support for CSS 2.1 and CSS 3 properties
  • A new tab-switching shortcut that shows previews of the tab you’re switching to
  • Improved control over the Smart Location Bar (aka the “Awesome Bar”) using special characters to restrict your search
  • Support for new page elements for embedding Ogg Theora video and Ogg Vorbis audio content — show videos and play songs on web pages without requiring plug-ins
  • Firefox’s first implementation of the W3C Geolocation API
  • JavaScript query selectors, web worker threads, SVG transforms and some support for offline applications

Have you downloaded it yet? What are your impressions? Leave a comment below.

See Also:



How Much Is the Apple Tax?

Apple taxToday Apple announced new notebooks, but Microsoft unleashed the hounds yesterday, ranting about an Apple tax.

The concept, which has merit, is that Apple’s computers cost more than PCs. Just how much? Apple hinted at the number in its event today:

Retail share: 17.6 percent market share of unit sales.

Revenue share: 31.3 percent of retail sales.

In other words, where one in five computer sales is an Apple, these account for one of every three dollars spent. Apple has more share of the revenue because its computer cost more.

No matter how you crunch the numbers, they imply that Apple charges at least 50 percent more than other manufacturers, maybe even twice as much. This isn’t a new revelation, but it’s an interesting method used by Microsoft, which doesn’t even manufacture hardware.

Though PC makers, like Dell, offer an astoundingly large selection of laptops, it’s still hard to determine exactly what is comparable. Factor in the details that Apple includes to make its machines higher end (or at least seem that way) and you’re quickly comparing apples to…. Oh, you finish the joke.

Many web developers have switched to Mac for reasons beyond hardware features or cost. The built-in Unix-ish command line is comfortable. It’s easy to set up a development environment similar to the servers that hold our code.

Is the Apple tax worth it to you? Regardless of whether you’re an Apple user, what would you want from other computer manufacturers?

See also:



Google Removes The 404 Blinders

Google added a simple, yet extremely useful feature to its suite of Webmaster Tools. Now you can see who is linking to pages that don’t exist. And maybe, you can do something about it.

Example 404 pages in Webmaster tools

Previously, users could view which pages were not found, but had no information about where those links came from. With the addition of the sources, webmasters can change the link (if they own the site), or e-mail and ask nicely.

As Google’s Matt Cutts says, these are some of the easiest links you’ll ever get. No PageRank passes when someone links to a page that doesn’t exist, even when there’s an errant HTML tag in the URL. While asking someone to change the link may sound like a lot of work, it’s not, in comparison to scoping out new links. In the case of broken links, you know they want to link to you, so you’re just alerting them to a mistake.

If you haven’t checked out Webmaster Tools yet, this is a good excuse to look it over. If much of your traffic comes from Google (and for many of us, that’s greater than 50 percent), it’s important to know how it sees your site. Plus, fixing mistakes should make you look better to all search engines and, more importantly, your users.

See also: