<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >

<channel>
    <title>Webmonkey &#187; Browsers</title>
    <atom:link href="http://www.webmonkey.com/category/browsers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <link>http://www.webmonkey.com</link>
    <description>The Web Developer&#039;s Resource</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 20:20:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
    
    <item>
        <title>Chrome for Android Eases Mobile Headaches With Password, Form Syncing</title>
        <link>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/04/chrome-for-android-eases-mobile-headaches-with-password-form-syncing/</link>
        <comments>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/04/chrome-for-android-eases-mobile-headaches-with-password-form-syncing/#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 19:49:05 +0000</pubDate>

                <dc:creator>Scott Gilbertson</dc:creator>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmonkey.com/?p=61517</guid>
        		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
            <enclosure url="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/chromelogo-200x100.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="48000" />
                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rss_thumbnail"><img src="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/chromelogo.jpg" alt="Chrome for Android Eases Mobile Headaches With Password, Form Syncing" /></div>Filling out online forms and keeping track of passwords is hard enough without a tiny mobile keyboard complicating things. Google's latest version of Chrome for Android can help ease that pain thanks to new sync features that let you access your saved passwords and form fill data across devices.]]></description>

            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- wpautop enabled -->
<p><a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/chromelogo.jpg"><img src="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/chromelogo.jpg" alt="" title="chromelogo" width="266" height="267" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-61518" /></a>Google has updated the stable channel of Chrome for Android to Chrome 26, which offers <a href="http://chrome.blogspot.com/2013/04/fill-out-forms-faster-from-anywhere.html">two new syncing features</a> designed to save you a bit of time on mobile devices.</p>
<p>You can grab the latest version of Chrome for Android from the <a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.android.chrome">Google Play Store</a>. </p>
<p>This release has two noteworthy features &#8212; password syncing and form autofill syncing. Keeping track of passwords is a pain and let&#8217;s face it, most mobile password managers leave much to be desired. With the new Chrome for Android you can sync and access your saved passwords across devices. </p>
<p>Even if you prefer not to have Chrome store your passwords for you, the form autofill syncing is equally handy &#8212; especially given how tedious it can be to fill out forms using your mobile device&#8217;s tiny keyboard. </p>
<p>Like all of Chrome&#8217;s syncing features, you&#8217;ll need to be signed into your Google account to use the new password and autofill sync.</p>
<p>This release also fixed a few bugs and offers some modest performance and stability improvements. For more details, see <a href="http://chrome.blogspot.com/2013/04/fill-out-forms-faster-from-anywhere.html">the Chrome blog</a>.</p>
<div id='linker_widget' class='contextly-widget'></div>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/04/chrome-for-android-eases-mobile-headaches-with-password-form-syncing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>

        
    </item>
    
    <item>
        <title>Mozilla Imagines a Brave New Multi-Core Firefox With &#8216;Servo&#8217;</title>
        <link>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/04/mozillas-servo/</link>
        <comments>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/04/mozillas-servo/#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 13:31:09 +0000</pubDate>

                <dc:creator>Scott Gilbertson</dc:creator>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmonkey.com/?p=61508</guid>
        		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Servo]]></category>
            <enclosure url="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/zoomblur_by_Andreas_Levers_flickr-200x100.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="48000" />
                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rss_thumbnail"><img src="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/zoomblur_by_Andreas_Levers_flickr.jpg" alt="Mozilla Imagines a Brave New Multi-Core Firefox With &#8216;Servo&#8217;" /></div>Mozilla wants future versions of Firefox to take advantage of tomorrow’s faster, multi-core devices. To make that happen Mozilla is developing a brand new browser engine dubbed Servo. But Servo isn't just about speeding up the browser, it could also help pave the way for a whole new class of more powerful web apps.]]></description>

            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- wpautop enabled -->
<p><div id="attachment_61512" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 590px"><a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/zoomblur_by_Andreas_Levers_flickr.jpg"><img src="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/zoomblur_by_Andreas_Levers_flickr.jpg" alt="" title="zoomblur_by_Andreas_Levers_flickr" width="580" height="354" class="size-full wp-image-61512" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">&#8216;Servo,&#8217; bring Firefox into the massive, parallel future. <em>Image: <a href="https://secure.flickr.com/photos/96dpi/2893917011/">Andreas Levers/Flickr</a></em></p></div>Google may be <a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/04/what-googles-webkit-fork-means-for-the-web-and-web-developers/">forking the WebKit rendering engine</a> to speed up Chrome, but Mozilla has unveiled a somewhat more ambitious long-term plan to speed up Firefox &#8212; rewriting the rendering engine from the ground up.</p>
<p>Mozilla wants future versions of Firefox to be able to &#8220;take advantage of tomorrow’s faster, multi-core, heterogeneous computing architectures,&#8221; <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2013/04/03/mozilla-and-samsung-collaborate-on-next-generation-web-browser-engine/">writes Mozilla CTO Brendan Eich</a> on the company&#8217;s blog. To make that happen Mozilla is developing a new browser engine dubbed Servo.</p>
<p>While Servo is likely several years from being a finished product, it&#8217;s an important step in the direction of faster browsers and more capable web apps. Right now you can throw all the cores you want at Firefox, but sadly it won&#8217;t be any faster because it isn&#8217;t threaded. Servo will help Mozilla build a multi-threaded version of Firefox that will not just speed up the browser, but could enable a whole new class of web apps.</p>
<p>Samsung&#8217;s involvement in the project also hints at another reason for Servo &#8212; a more powerful engine behind Mozilla&#8217;s mobile Firefox OS. </p>
<p>Servo is not an extension of Gecko, Firefox&#8217;s current rendering engine, but an entirely new beast written specifically to take advantage of modern, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_computing#Massive_parallel_processing">massively parallel processing hardware</a>.</p>
<p>Servo is written in Mozilla&#8217;s homegrown Rust programming language, a C++ style language that attempts to provide more security by avoiding memory corruption and buffer overflows, a common attack vector in today&#8217;s browsers. Eich calls Rust &#8220;safe by default&#8221; and says that Rust will stop &#8220;entire classes of memory management errors&#8221;, helping to eliminate a common cause of not just security flaws, but browser crashes. </p>
<p>As part of the announcement Mozilla has released Rust 0.6, which contains code contributed by Samsung in its effort to port Rust to ARM processors and Android. For more on Rust, check out <a href="http://www.rust-lang.org/">the project&#8217;s website</a> and <a href="https://github.com/mozilla/rust/wiki/Doc-project-FAQ">FAQ</a> or <a href="https://github.com/mozilla/rust">browse the code on GitHub</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s going to be a little while, but in a not too distant future Servo may bring a speedy new Firefox to a tablet or phone near you. </p>
<div id='linker_widget' class='contextly-widget'></div>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/04/mozillas-servo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
        <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>

        
    </item>
    
    <item>
        <title>What Google&#8217;s WebKit Fork Means for the Web and Web Developers</title>
        <link>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/04/what-googles-webkit-fork-means-for-the-web-and-web-developers/</link>
        <comments>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/04/what-googles-webkit-fork-means-for-the-web-and-web-developers/#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 18:02:12 +0000</pubDate>

                <dc:creator>Scott Gilbertson</dc:creator>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmonkey.com/?p=61495</guid>
        		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
            <enclosure url="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/freewaychoices_by_sacks08_flickrcc-200x100.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="48000" />
                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rss_thumbnail"><img src="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/freewaychoices_by_sacks08_flickrcc.jpg" alt="What Google&#8217;s WebKit Fork Means for the Web and Web Developers" /></div>Google is breaking away from WebKit, the rendering engine that currently powers the company's Chrome web browser. Google has forked WebKit to create its own rendering engine, dubbed Blink. While it may dash the dreams of those hoping for a WebKit-only web, Blink is good news for the web and web developers.]]></description>

            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- wpautop enabled -->
<p><div id="attachment_61496" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 590px"><a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/freewaychoices_by_sacks08_flickrcc.jpg"><img src="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/freewaychoices_by_sacks08_flickrcc.jpg" alt="" title="freewaychoices_by_sacks08_flickrcc" width="580" height="322" class="size-full wp-image-61496" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Most likely you&#8217;ll go your way and I&#8217;ll go mine. <em>Image: <a href="https://secure.flickr.com/photos/29071316@N06/3470399603/">sacks08</a>/Flickr</em></p></div>If you were secretly hoping that all web browsers would one day give up and adopt the WebKit rendering engine, we&#8217;ve got some bad news for you &#8212; Google just crushed those dreams. </p>
<p>Google has announced it is forking the WebKit rendering engine to create Blink, a new rendering engine for all Chromium-based web browsers &#8212; notably Chrome, Chromium, Opera and their mobile counterparts.</p>
<p>Blink will make its web debut in Chrome 28 (and <a href="http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2013/hello-blink/">Opera 14</a>). Based on Google&#8217;s <a href="http://www.chromium.org/blink/developer-faq">Blink FAQ</a> and <a href="http://blog.chromium.org/2013/04/blink-rendering-engine-for-chromium.html">initial announcement</a>, expect Blink to diverge significantly from the WebKit project.</p>
<p>That means web developers will soon be back to testing their sites in both Chrome and Safari. Of course, as has been <a href="http://paulirish.com/2013/webkit-for-developers/">pointed out in the past</a>, there have always been enough significant differences between the two that you should have been testing in both anyway.</p>
<p>Among the good news in the announcement is Google&#8217;s decision to not use CSS prefixes for new features. Instead Blink will follow Firefox&#8217;s lead and use flags to enable experimental features. That means developers can test and use new features by setting the appropriate flag in <code>about:flags</code>. Blink will carry over support for all currently existing <code>-webkit-</code> prefixes, but will be removing the prefixed features in favor of the unprefixed rules as soon as it is safe to do so. </p>
<p>The other good news is that there are once again four major rendering engines on the web. </p>
<p>As much as web developers might like to see the web have a single rendering engine that all browsers use, that sort of monoculture doesn&#8217;t lead to <a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/2012/02/webkit-isnt-breaking-the-web-you-are/">a healthy web</a>. It&#8217;s interesting to note that Google&#8217;s fork appears to be motivated by this very problem, albeit from a browser maker&#8217;s angle &#8212; the sheer number of projects using WebKit meant development wasn&#8217;t moving fast enough for Google. </p>
<p>Adam Barth, Software Engineer at Google, <a href="http://blog.chromium.org/2013/04/blink-rendering-engine-for-chromium.html">writes on the Chromium blog</a> that Google&#8217;s decision to fork WebKit was &#8220;not an easy decision.&#8221; But Google believes that &#8220;having multiple rendering engines &#8212; similar to having multiple browsers &#8212; will spur innovation and over time improve the health of the entire open web ecosystem.&#8221;</p>
<p>Google has outlined a new <a href="http://www.chromium.org/blink#new-features">policy regarding experimental new features</a> that differs significantly from WebKit&#8217;s here&#8217;s-a-new-feature-just-ship-it policy. Blink will instead limit new features to those that have at least been proposed as standards and preferably already have at least one other implementation. In those cases where WebKit is the source of a new feature, Google has pledged to &#8220;propose an editor&#8217;s draft (or equivalent) to the relevant standards group&#8221; and &#8220;discuss the feature publicly with implementers of other browser engines.&#8221; </p>
<p>For web developers little will likely change in the sort term. The first browsers with Blink at their core will not be on the web for some months and when they do arrive they will at first differ little from WebKit. The longer term picture will likely look pretty much like the web before <a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/02/presto-is-dead-long-live-opera/">Opera killed off its Presto rendering engine</a> last month &#8212; four major browsers with minor differences between them that require testing to ensure total support.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also the question of what happens to the WebKit project. Google has been one of the driving forces behind WebKit for some time. Now those contributions are gone and it&#8217;s up to other WebKit supporters &#8212; Apple, BlackBerry and Samsung, among others &#8212; to pick up the slack (with Samsung joining in Mozilla&#8217;s next-gen rendering engine project it&#8217;s unclear exactly how much commitment Samsung has to WebKit).</p>
<p>For more background on the Blink announcement, see <a href="http://www.chromium.org/blink/developer-faq">Google&#8217;s FAQ</a>. For one of the best all-around, unbiased looks at what Blink means for the web, see <a href="http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2013/04/blink.html">Peter-Paul Koch&#8217;s write-up over on the QuirksMode blog</a>.</p>
<div id='linker_widget' class='contextly-widget'></div>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/04/what-googles-webkit-fork-means-for-the-web-and-web-developers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>

        
    </item>
    
    <item>
        <title>Latest Version of Firefox Brings Better Privacy Controls</title>
        <link>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/04/latest-version-of-firefox-brings-better-privacy-controls/</link>
        <comments>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/04/latest-version-of-firefox-brings-better-privacy-controls/#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:35:59 +0000</pubDate>

                <dc:creator>Scott Gilbertson</dc:creator>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmonkey.com/?p=61479</guid>
        		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
            <enclosure url="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/cameras-200x100.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="48000" />
                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rss_thumbnail"><img src="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/cameras.jpg" alt="Latest Version of Firefox Brings Better Privacy Controls" /></div>It's sometimes dismissed as "porn mode" but private browsing mode has legitimate uses as well -- like staying signed in to two Gmail accounts at the same time. Mozilla's latest version of Firefox makes it simple to have private mode windows right alongside normal windows. Firefox 20 also sports a new and improved downloads manager and some new web standards for developers looking to test the latest and greatest the web has to offer.]]></description>

            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- wpautop enabled --><div id="attachment_61483" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 590px"><a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/cameras.jpg"><img src="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/cameras.jpg" alt="" title="cameras" width="580" height="300" class="size-full wp-image-61483" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Firefox 20 offers an easier way to avoid prying eyes. <em>Image: <a href="https://secure.flickr.com/photos/aroberts/3035796/">Andy Roberts/Flickr</a></em></p></div></p>
<p>Mozilla <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2013/04/02/15-years-of-a-better-web/">turned 15 this week</a> and the company is celebrating with a new release of its flagship Firefox web browser.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re already using Firefox the latest version should arrive shortly. If you&#8217;d like to take the latest release for a spin, head on over to <a href="https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/fx/#desktop">Mozilla&#8217;s download page</a>.</p>
<p>Among the <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2013/04/02/firefox-gives-you-more-control-over-your-privacy/">new features in Firefox 20</a> is a revamped per-window private browsing mode. The new private browsing mode mirrors what you’ll find in Google&#8217;s Chrome browser and is really how Firefox&#8217;s private browsing mode should have been all along. </p>
<p>Now when you want to start a private browsing session in Firefox you simply select the new &#8220;New Private Window&#8221; menu option. That will open a new window noting that Firefox will discard any history, search history, download history, web form history, cookies, or temporary internet files for sites you visit in that window. Any files you download and pages you bookmark <em>will</em> be kept.</p>
<p>The new per-window model is much more intuitive than the old method of private browsing which put your normal browsing session on hold, hid it away somewhere and opened a new, private session. Now it&#8217;s easy to have private windows right alongside normal windows, very handy for those who, for example, need to log in to two different Gmail accounts simultaneously. </p>
<p>The other major visible change in Firefox 20 is the redesigned downloads window. Mozilla proposed the new download toolbar button and overlay window design so long ago that Apple’s Safari browser has <a href="http://limi.net/articles/safari-downloads/">already long since copied and released its own version</a>. </p>
<p>While Firefox might not be the first to get its proposed downloads interface to the web, it’s welcome nonetheless and alleviates the need to cycle through windows or hit keyboard shortcuts just to see if your downloads are done. The button also helpfully converts to a progress bar when you&#8217;re actually downloading something.</p>
<p>To see additional info beyond what&#8217;s available in the new overlay, just click the &#8220;show all downloads&#8221; button at the bottom of the list.</p>
<p><iframe width="580" height="326" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/0iJO9iF3MKE?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>One interesting aspect of the new &#8220;Show All Downloads&#8221; window is that you may discover your history of downloaded files is larger than you think. If you&#8217;ve been clearing your download history by clicking the &#8220;Clear List&#8221; button in the old downloads window, well, that button was quite literal &#8212; it just cleared the list. It didn&#8217;t actually remove anything from your downloads history. This can be incredibly good news if you&#8217;ve misplaced a file or slightly disconcerting if you thought you were deleting references to any sensitive files you may have downloaded. To really clear your downloads be sure to use Firefox&#8217;s &#8220;Clear Recent History&#8221; menu, which has an option to actually delete everything in your download history.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also worth noting that the new downloads manager works with the private browsing mode as well. You can manage downloads within private windows via a separate downloads interface which is then scrubbed when the private session is closed. </p>
<p>For more details on everything that&#8217;s new in the revamped download dialog, read through Firefox developer Mike Conley&#8217;s <a href="http://mikeconley.ca/blog/2013/04/02/downloading-stuff-in-firefox-its-better-now/">post on the new download manager</a>.</p>
<p>Firefox 20 has a few goodies under the hood for web developers, including support for <a href="http://www.webrtc.org/">WebRTC</a>&#8216;s <code>getUserMedia</code> API, which allows developers to access the user&#8217;s camera and microphone (with permission) for things like <a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/02/google-mozilla-team-up-for-skype-killing-video-call-demo/">Skype-style video calls</a>. The stable release of Firefox still doesn&#8217;t offer full support for WebRTC, but future releases will continue to add more features over time.</p>
<p>For more details on everything that&#8217;s new in Firefox 20 &#8212; including some speed improvements for page loads and downloads &#8212; see Mozilla&#8217;s <a href="https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/20.0/releasenotes/">release notes</a>.</p>
<div id='linker_widget' class='contextly-widget'></div>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/04/latest-version-of-firefox-brings-better-privacy-controls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>

        
    </item>
    
    <item>
        <title>Microsoft&#8217;s Revamped &#8216;Modern.IE&#8217; Offers Free Windows Virtual Machines</title>
        <link>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/04/microsofts-revamped-modern-ie-offers-free-windows-virtual-machines/</link>
        <comments>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/04/microsofts-revamped-modern-ie-offers-free-windows-virtual-machines/#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 18:38:45 +0000</pubDate>

                <dc:creator>Scott Gilbertson</dc:creator>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmonkey.com/?p=61470</guid>
        		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE]]></category>
            <enclosure url="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/iehtml5-w.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="48000" />
                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rss_thumbnail"><img src="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/iehtml5-w.jpg" alt="Microsoft&#8217;s Revamped &#8216;Modern.IE&#8217; Offers Free Windows Virtual Machines" /></div>Microsoft has updated its modern.IE website, which offers developers tools for testing their websites in both new and old versions of Internet Explorer. To sweeten the deal for Mac-wielding web developers the company is giving away USB sticks with Windows 8 and Parallels in exchange for a $25 donation to charity.]]></description>

            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- wpautop enabled --><div id="attachment_60767" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 590px"><a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/iehtml5.png"><img src="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/iehtml5.png" alt="" title="iehtml5" width="580" height="207" class="size-full wp-image-60767" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text"><em>Image: Screenshot/Webmonkey</em></p></div></p>
<p>Microsoft has updated its <a href="http://www.modern.ie/">modern.IE</a> website with some new tools for testing sites in IE 10 and earlier versions of Internet Explorer.</p>
<p>Launched <a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/01/microsoft-simplifies-internet-explorer-testing-with-modern-ie/">earlier this year</a>, modern.IE aims to simplify the sometimes arduous process of getting websites to work in older versions of Microsoft&#8217;s Internet Explorer web browser. The site also serves to promote web standards and help developers avoid mistakes like only supporting WebKit browsers &#8212; roughly the modern equivalent of the regrettable &#8220;works best in IE6&#8243; websites of 2001.</p>
<p>Today&#8217;s <a href="https://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2013/04/02/new-on-modern-ie-free-vm-downloads-windows-8-quickstart-kits-enhanced-code-scanning-tools-and-more.aspx">updates for modern.IE</a> address the most common user suggestions and include some new virtual machines for testing IE10 on Windows 7 and IE8 on Windows XP, better results from the site scanner (which now handles URLs behind a firewall) and some more translations.</p>
<p>The big news for Mac developers though is that Microsoft is offering a limited number of &#8220;Windows QuickStart kits&#8221; for Mac &#8212; which consist of Parallels Desktop 8 and Windows 8 on a USB stick &#8212; in exchange for a $25 donation to charity (plus $8 shipping). That&#8217;s a pretty awesome deal and as of this writing <a href="http://www.modern.ie/">the site</a> has slowed to a crawl, presumably under the heavy load of interested developers.</p>
<p>Microsoft has also announced a new partnership with the Webby Awards to create the new <a href="http://winners.webbyawards.com/">Webby Award Winners Gallery and Archive</a>. The site showcases Webby nominees and winners all the way back to 1997. The design is responsive and takes advantage of some IE 10-only features, like touch events, but it works in all modern browsers as well.</p>
<div id='linker_widget' class='contextly-widget'></div>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/04/microsofts-revamped-modern-ie-offers-free-windows-virtual-machines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>

        
    </item>
    
    <item>
        <title>Mozilla, Epic Bring Unreal 3 Gaming Engine to the Web</title>
        <link>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/03/mozilla-epic-bring-unreal-3-gaming-engine-to-the-web/</link>
        <comments>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/03/mozilla-epic-bring-unreal-3-gaming-engine-to-the-web/#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:48:10 +0000</pubDate>

                <dc:creator>Scott Gilbertson</dc:creator>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmonkey.com/?p=61432</guid>
        		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Apps]]></category>
            <enclosure url="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/unreal3web-200x100.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="48000" />
                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rss_thumbnail"><img src="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/unreal3web.jpg" alt="Mozilla, Epic Bring Unreal 3 Gaming Engine to the Web" /></div>Mozilla has partnered with Epic Games to bring the Unreal 3 gaming engine to Firefox. The result is a high-end gaming engine that could change the way you think of web-based video games.]]></description>

            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- wpautop enabled -->
<div id="attachment_61433" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 590px"><img src="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/unreal3web.jpg" alt="" title="unreal3web" width="580" height="358" class="size-full wp-image-61433" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Unreal 3 engine in Firefox. <br /><em>Screenshot: Webmonkey</em>.</p></div>
<p>Mozilla has partnered with Epic Games to <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2013/03/27/mozilla-is-unlocking-the-power-of-the-web-as-a-platform-for-gaming/">bring the Unreal 3 gaming engine to the web</a>. The result is a high-end gaming engine that could change the way you think of web-based games.</p>
<p>The Unreal 3 engine has previously been ported to Flash, but this is the first time a plugin-free (and therefore mobile-friendly) version has been built for the web.</p>
<p>Mozilla is hoping this project will help turn the web into a more serious gaming platform capable of running top-tier console titles. </p>
<p>Combining WebGL, <a href="https://github.com/kripken/emscripten/wiki">Emscripten</a>, a tool for compiling C++ apps into JavaScript, and the brand new <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/luke/2013/03/21/asm-js-in-firefox-nightly/">asm.js</a>, Unreal 3 for the web can, according to Mozilla, &#8220;rival native performance.&#8221;</p>
<p>While the Unreal 3 port is incredibly cool, there are still some stumbling blocks on the path to the web as a top-tier gaming platform, not the least of which is that load times for most games would be massive. Think hours, not minutes, to stream the complex graphics from a server to your mobile device &#8212; probably not something anyone particularly wants to sit through.</p>
<p>In other words, while Mozilla and Epic have made some impressive progress bringing Unreal 3 to JavaScript, it&#8217;s still going to be a while before you&#8217;re playing your favorite console games on the web.</p>
<p>However, Mozilla says it is &#8220;working with premium game publishers such as Disney, EA and ZeptoLab who are using the same technology to bring performance optimizations to their top-rated games.&#8221; The company is also hoping other browsers will make it possible to run the Unreal engine in their own JavaScript engines. The Chromium project is already <a href="https://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=2599">discussing</a> just how to do it.</p>
<p>For more on the project and to catch a glimpse of Unreal 3 running in the browser, check out the video below.</p>
<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/XsyogXtyU9o" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<div id='linker_widget' class='contextly-widget'></div>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/03/mozilla-epic-bring-unreal-3-gaming-engine-to-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>

        
    </item>
    
    <item>
        <title>Latest Chrome Tries to Rid the Web of Misspellings</title>
        <link>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/03/latest-chrome-tries-to-rid-the-web-of-misspellings/</link>
        <comments>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/03/latest-chrome-tries-to-rid-the-web-of-misspellings/#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:26:57 +0000</pubDate>

                <dc:creator>Scott Gilbertson</dc:creator>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmonkey.com/?p=61413</guid>
        		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
            <enclosure url="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/chrome-200x100.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="48000" />
                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rss_thumbnail"><img src="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/chrome.jpg" alt="Latest Chrome Tries to Rid the Web of Misspellings" /></div>Google has vastly improved Chrome's spell checker, but in order to really rid the web of poor spelling, the company will need to come up with some way of ensuring that everyone commenting on YouTube is actually using Chrome.]]></description>

            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- wpautop enabled -->
<p><img src="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/chromeicon.jpg">Google has <a href="http://chrome.blogspot.fr/2013/03/oodles-of-improvements-to-chromes-spell.html">updated the stable release</a> of its Chrome web browser, adding a much-improved native spell check and word suggestion features.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome/">new versions</a> are live for Windows, Linux and Chrome OS. Google says it is &#8220;still working on Mac support&#8221; (Chrome for Mac has been updated to v26, but it does not yet contain the new spell checker).</p>
<p>To use the <a href="https://support.google.com/chrome/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=95604">new spell checking feature</a>, turn on the new &#8220;Ask Google for suggestions&#8221; option which you&#8217;ll see when you right click any highlighted misspelling. The new spell check also does some grammar checking and recognizes proper nouns (especially people&#8217;s names, handy for composing email) and homonyms.</p>
<p>Chrome 26 also sports a new personal dictionary. If the spell-checker keeps underlining a word you want it to ignore, just right-click the word and select &#8220;Add to dictionary.&#8221; If you&#8217;re signed in and syncing your data through your Google account your dictionary additions will go with you. </p>
<div id='linker_widget' class='contextly-widget'></div>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/03/latest-chrome-tries-to-rid-the-web-of-misspellings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>

        
    </item>
    
    <item>
        <title>Google Discontinues Site-Blocking Service</title>
        <link>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/03/google-discontinues-site-blocking-service/</link>
        <comments>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/03/google-discontinues-site-blocking-service/#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:35:12 +0000</pubDate>

                <dc:creator>Scott Gilbertson</dc:creator>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmonkey.com/?p=61385</guid>
        		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
            <enclosure url="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/google-200x100.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="48000" />
                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rss_thumbnail"><img src="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/google.jpg" alt="Google Discontinues Site-Blocking Service" /></div>The hits just keep getting killed off. Until recently Google allowed you to stop certain domains from showing up in Google search results, but now the company has discontinued its site-blocking tool and suggests replacing it with a far less capable Chrome extension.]]></description>

            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- wpautop enabled -->
<p><div id="attachment_57824" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 360px"><a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/deadend.jpg"><img src="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/deadend.jpg" alt="" title="deadend" width="350" height="208" class="size-full wp-image-57824" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text"><em>Image: <a href='http://www.flickr.com/photos/geishaboy500/2496995573/'>THOR</a>/Flickr</em></p></div>The hits just keep getting killed off. Google is shutting down yet another service &#8212; the company&#8217;s domain blocking tool, which allowed logged-in users to block unwanted domains from Google&#8217;s search results.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s site-blocking tool was originally aimed at &#8220;content farm spam,&#8221; but Google hasn&#8217;t done much with it of late, and it even stopped working for a while, despite being available via a link from your profile.</p>
<p>Now the service is <a href="https://support.google.com/websearch/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=1210386">officially gone</a>, replaced by a <a href="https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/personal-blocklist-by-goo/nolijncfnkgaikbjbdaogikpmpbdcdef">Chrome add-on</a> that does nearly the same thing. Unfortunately that means the ability to ban sites from Google&#8217;s search results is now limited to those using Google&#8217;s Chrome web browser. For more on the Chrome add-on <a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/2011/02/new-chrome-add-on-blocks-sites-from-search-results/">see our earlier review</a>.</p>
<p>The bad news about the Chrome extension is that it&#8217;s client-side filtering, not server-side. That means that if Google returns results from domains you&#8217;ve blocked those results are simply hidden (sometimes there&#8217;s even a brief flash of the blocked results). </p>
<p>That means you&#8217;ll end up with fewer search results than you would with the server-side solution, which filtered out your blocked domains <em>before</em> the results were sent. For example, if there are ten results on the first page and three are from domains you&#8217;ve blocked, using the add-on method you&#8217;ll only see seven results, whereas the server-side method would have fetched the next three results to show a total of ten.</p>
<p>If you used the account-based version of the blocking tool, you can head over to your account and <a href="http://www.google.com/reviews/t">grab the list of sites you had blocked</a>. Just add those sites to the Chrome extension and you&#8217;ll be back up and running in no time, with not an Experts-Exchange, Quora or W3Schools link to be seen (or whatever you consider search results spam). </p>
<p><em>Home Page Photo:<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/carlosluna/2856173673/lightbox/"> Carlos Luna </a>/ Flickr </em></p>
<div id='linker_widget' class='contextly-widget'></div>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/03/google-discontinues-site-blocking-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>

        
    </item>
    
    <item>
        <title>New Adblock Plus Doesn&#8217;t Need No Stinking Google Play Store</title>
        <link>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/03/new-adblock-plus-doesnt-need-no-stinking-google-play-store/</link>
        <comments>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/03/new-adblock-plus-doesnt-need-no-stinking-google-play-store/#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:16:12 +0000</pubDate>

                <dc:creator>Scott Gilbertson</dc:creator>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmonkey.com/?p=61345</guid>
        		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
            <enclosure url="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/abp-200x100.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="48000" />
                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rss_thumbnail"><img src="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/abp.jpg" alt="New Adblock Plus Doesn&#8217;t Need No Stinking Google Play Store" /></div>Google may have booted Adblock Plus and its ilk from the Google Play Store, but you can still install the popular add-on on your Android phone. Here's how.]]></description>

            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- wpautop enabled --><a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/adblockplus.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-61288" title="adblockplus" src="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/adblockplus.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></a>It may have been <a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/03/google-boots-ad-blockers-from-google-play-store/">kicked out of the Google Play Store</a>, but you can still <a href="https://adblockplus.org/releases/adblock-plus-11-for-android-released">get your Adblock Plus for Android</a>.</p>
<p>In fact, even if you already have Adblock Plus installed on your Android phone you should install this latest release direct from the source since the older, Play Store-based versions will no longer be receiving updates.</p>
<p>To install Adblock Plus manually you&#8217;ll need to make sure that you&#8217;ve enabled your phone to install software from &#8220;unknown sources&#8221; (you can enable this in Settings under either Applications or Security, depending on which version of Android you have). Then just head over to the <a href="https://adblockplus.org/">Adblock Plus site</a> and hit the download link.</p>
<p>A number of people in the comments on the Adblock Plus site have reported installation problems with various Android phones, but I had no issues installing Adblock Plus on a Galaxy Nexus using the <a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/03/reborn-opera-mobile-sings-on-android/">latest beta of Opera Mobile</a>.</p>
<p>Among the notable changes in this release are the automatic updates &#8212; which no longer require the Google Play version &#8212; a new user interface theme and a fix for a bug that would sometimes cause blank pages in Chrome for Android. For the full details on everything that&#8217;s new, be sure to <a href="https://adblockplus.org/releases/adblock-plus-11-for-android-released">check out the release notes</a>.</p>
<div id='linker_widget' class='contextly-widget'></div>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/03/new-adblock-plus-doesnt-need-no-stinking-google-play-store/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>

        
    </item>
    
    <item>
        <title>Mozilla Shows Off Powerful New Developer Tools for Firefox</title>
        <link>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/03/mozilla-shows-off-powerful-new-developer-tools-for-firefox/</link>
        <comments>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/03/mozilla-shows-off-powerful-new-developer-tools-for-firefox/#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:08:52 +0000</pubDate>

                <dc:creator>Scott Gilbertson</dc:creator>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmonkey.com/?p=61320</guid>
        		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
            <enclosure url="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/ffdevtools-200x100.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="48000" />
                    <description><![CDATA[<div class="rss_thumbnail"><img src="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/ffdevtools.jpg" alt="Mozilla Shows Off Powerful New Developer Tools for Firefox" /></div>WebKit's developer tools have long been popular with web developers, but Mozilla is experimenting with some powerful new tools that just might convince developers to jump ship for Firefox.]]></description>

            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- wpautop enabled -->
<p><div id="attachment_61322" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 590px"><a href="http://paulrouget.com/e/devtoolsnext/"><img src="http://www.webmonkey.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/ffdevtools.jpg" alt="" title="ffdevtools" width="580" height="325" class="size-full wp-image-61322" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">A mockup of what it might look like to author your pages right inside Firefox. <em>Image: <a href="http://paulrouget.com/e/devtoolsnext/">Paul Rouget</a></em>.</p></div>You asked for them and now Mozilla&#8217;s Firefox developer tools team is hard at work building <a href="http://paulrouget.com/e/devtoolsnext/">a slew of new tools for web developers</a>.</p>
<p>A few weeks back Mozilla&#8217;s Paul Rouget asked developers what they&#8217;d like to see in future versions of Firefox&#8217;s developer tools. The resulting <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5325445">thread on Hacker News</a> is quite extensive and full of some great ideas that Rouget and others have been hacking on ever since. </p>
<p>The result is a bunch of new tools that are mostly still at the experimental mock-up stage, though a couple are available now in the <a href="http://nightly.mozilla.org/">Nightly Channel</a> if you&#8217;d like to try them out.</p>
<p>The most popular request, and by far the coolest of the bunch, is the ability to do live edits in the text editor of your choice &#8212; effectively controlling Firefox with your editor. The video below shows an example of live editing via the popular Sublime Edit. This would essentially eliminate the need to jump from your editor to the browser, hit refresh, jump back to your editor, and so on. A dance that most of us are all too familiar with. Perhaps the best part, Rouget says this will work with the mobile version of Firefox as well.</p>
<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/UrnB8lZnx4I" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>Mozilla is also working on the opposite idea &#8212; authoring in the browser. That means putting an editor inside Firefox&#8217;s Dev Tools suite. Thus far this idea is less fleshed out, but the possibilities include putting in something like <a href="http://jsfiddle.net/">jsFiddle</a> or perhaps a more traditional file-based editor. </p>
<p>Other new tools include some catch up features that bring Firefox&#8217;s Dev tools up to speed with what you&#8217;ll find in WebKit browsers. Examples include a new network panel prototype and the ability to doc the tools to the right side of the screen &#8212; great for wide monitors (this is already available in Nightly). There&#8217;s also a new &#8220;repaint&#8221; view that shows what gets repainted on the page, very useful if you&#8217;re trying to improve performance. Rouget has also been working on a new, dark theme for the Firefox dev tools.</p>
<p>Rouget recently <a href="http://paulrouget.com/e/fontinspector/">added a font inspector panel</a> (available in the Nightly Builds) that makes it easy to see which fonts a page is using, including details like whether or not the font file is local or served through a service like Typekit, as well as the actual <code>@font-face</code> code used.</p>
<p>In what appears to be an unrelated effort, Mozilla developer Dave Townsend has been <a href="http://www.oxymoronical.com/blog/2013/03/Hacking-on-Tilt">hacking on Firefox&#8217;s Tilt View Tool</a>. Tilt View <a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/2011/07/add-a-little-3d-tilt-to-your-website/">offers a 3D look</a> at a page that can be very helpful for visualizing the structure of your code and spotting bugs you might otherwise miss. Townsend has come up with a number of ways to extend Tilt, including showing only links and only elements that change on hover. </p>
<p>Townsend even suggests that in the future you might be able to pair Tilt with your site analytics to see which links are most frequently clicked. Unfortunately you&#8217;ll have to wait a while before these features are actually available in Firefox; Townsend&#8217;s hacks rely on some core Firefox features that aren&#8217;t ready for prime time just yet.</p>
<p>While many of these coming features are, as yet, only prototypes, things are clearly looking up for Firefox&#8217;s dev tools. For more details on everything that&#8217;s new, be sure to check out <a href="http://paulrouget.com/e/devtoolsnext/">Rouget&#8217;s post</a>, as well as the <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5393864">related Hacker News</a> thread that Rouget has been posting to with some follow up info.</p>
<div id='linker_widget' class='contextly-widget'></div>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/03/mozilla-shows-off-powerful-new-developer-tools-for-firefox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>

        
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>