Archive for the ‘Web Services’ Category

File Under: servers, Web Services

New Arq 3 Taps Amazon Glacier for Backup Nirvana

Arq 3 makes it easy to navigate Amazon’s Glacier file storage service. Original Image: Christine Zenino/Flickr

Amazon’s Glacier file storage service costs less than a penny per gigabyte per month. It’s hard to think of a cheaper, better way to create and store an offsite backup of your files.

Of course backups are only useful if you actually create them on a regular basis. Unfortunately, getting your files into Glacier’s dirt-cheap storage requires either a manual effort on your part or some scripting-fu to automate your own system.

Back when Glacier first launched we speculated that it would be a perfect fit for a backup utility like the OS X backup app Arq. Now Arq 3 has been released and among its new features is built-in support for Amazon Glacier. Arq 3 is $29 per computer, upgrading from v2 is $15.

Arq creator Stefan Reitshamer sent over a preview of Arq 3 a while back and, having used it for the better part of a week now, I can attest that it, combined with Glacier, does indeed make for a near-perfect low-cost off-site backup solution.

Using Arq 3 with Glacier is simple. Just sign up for an Amazon Web services account and create a set of access keys. Then fire up Arq, enter your keys and select which files you want to back up. Choose Glacier for the storage type and then make any customizations you’d like (for example, excluding folders and files you don’t want backed up).

That’s all there is to it; close Arq and it will back up your files in the background. By default Arq 3 is set to make Glacier backups every day at 12 a.m., but you can change that in the preferences.

Should disaster strike and you need to get your files out of Glacier (or S3), just fire up Arq, select the files you need and click “restore.” Arq will give you an estimate of your costs and you can adjust the download speed — the slower the download the cheaper it is to pull files out of Glacier. There’s also an open source command line client available on GitHub in the event that the Arq app is no longer around when you need to get your files back.

Estimating costs with Arq’s Glacier restore screen. Image: Screenshot/Webmonkey

Existing Arq users should note that Amazon currently doesn’t offer an API for moving from S3 to Glacier (though the company says one is in the works). That means if you want to switch any current S3 backups to Glacier you’ll need to first remove the folder from Arq and then re-add it to trigger the storage type dialog.

In order to get the most out of Arq 3 and Glacier it helps to understand how Glacier works. Unlike Amazon S3, which is designed for cheap but accessible file storage, Glacier is, as the name implies, playing the long, slow game. Glacier is intended for long-term storage that’s not accessed frequently. If you need to grab your files on a regular basis Glacier will likely end up costing you more than S3, but for secondary (or tertiary) backups of large files like images, videos or databases Glacier works wonderfully.

My backup scenario works like this: For local backups I have two external drives. One is nearly always connected and makes a Time Machine backup every night. Once a week I clone my entire drive off to the second external drive. For offsite backups I use rsync and cron to backup key documents to my own server (most are also stored in Dropbox, which is not really a backup service, but can, in a pinch, be used like one).

But my server was running out of space. Photo and video libraries are only getting bigger and most web hosting services tend to get very expensive once you pass the 100GB mark. That’s where Arq and Glacier come in. It took a while, but I now have all 120GB of my photos backed up to Glacier, which will cost me $1.20/month.

The only catch to using Glacier is that getting the data back out can take some time. There are also some additional charges for pulling down your data, but as noted above, Arq will give you an estimate of your costs and you can adjust the download speed to make things cheaper. The slow speeds aren’t ideal when you actually need your data, but these are secondary, worst-case scenario backups anyway. If my laptop drive dies, I can just copy the clone or Time Machine backup drive to get my files back. The Glacier backup is only there if my house burns down or floods or something else destroys my local backups. While it would, according to Arq’s estimate, cost about $60 and take over four days to get my data out of Glacier, that would likely seem like a bargain when I’d have otherwise lost everything.

File Under: Social, Web Services

Google’s Election Doodle Tells You Where to Vote

Image:Screenshot/Webmonkey.

It doesn’t have any fancy HTML5 or CSS 3 tricks to show off, but today’s Google doodle is a helpful one if you live in the United States. Click today’s election-themed ballot box doodle, plug in your address and Google will direct you where to vote.

The results page offers up a ballot summary (it won’t be complete in most places, but it highlights the presidential race, as well as local representatives), links to local registrar sites and, in case it can’t find your polling location, will direct you to your state voter information website.

Depending on where you live there are also links to Google Politics & Elections, YouTube Live for voting results and quite a few other bits of election-related info.

File Under: Multimedia, Web Services

Instagram Finally Embraces the Web

Instagram on the web. Image: Instagram.

Instagram is leaving the confines of the smartphone that birthed the wildly popular photo-sharing service to stake a spot on the web. Instagram began life as an iPhone-only photo-sharing app and eventually expanded to Android, but, until today, Instagram lacked a web presence.

The new Instagram web profiles are not the full Instagram experience on the web — there’s still no way to actually upload photos — but they do at least give you a URL to share with curious friends and family.

Your new Instagram URL gives your recently shared photographs a home on the web, along with your profile photo and any bio info you’ve added through the Instagram app. The web interface also handles most of Instagram’s basic social features, like following users, leaving comments and liking photos.

Instagram’s new web-based profiles are rolling out slowly over the next week. To see your profile, provided it’s available, just head to instagram.com/[username]. Assuming your photos are set to public, anyone will be able to see your profile by visiting that address; you do not need to be an Instagram user to view a public user’s profile on the web. If your photos are set to private they’ll only be visible to people that already follow you and are logged in to the site.

While the new profile pages mark Instagram’s first foray onto the web, the company has long offered an API and there are already numerous third-party websites that offer web-based access to Instagram profiles. Sites like web.stagram.com or statigr.am offer not only access to your photostream and comments, but additional features not found in the current incarnation of the “official” site — like embeddable gallery widgets and a variety of ways to view images.

File Under: Social, Web Services

New Sharing Tools Show Off Google Drive’s Ubiquitous Future

Image: Google

Google has added a new sharing feature to Google Drive — the company’s cloud storage service — that makes it easy to share your files with friends on Google+.

Now you can quickly share a file from Google Drive to Google+ and people in your Google+ circles will be able to open documents, play videos and view presentations right from your Google+ stream.

Google Drive is a key part of fulfilling the company’s vision for a cloud-centric computing future, but so far Drive remains on the periphery of most Google services. While the new Google+ sharing features may be a small change, it shows where Drive is headed — into all your Google services.

The new sharing features for Drive files are easy to use. When you click the “share” button next to a file in Google Drive (or right-click a file and select “share”) you’ll see a new Google+ icon alongside the familiar Twitter and Facebook options. Note that sharing a Drive file through Google+ will not change the sharing settings of that file. Your friends on Google+ will only be able to view or edit it if you’ve given them permission to do so in Google Drive. If you’d like anyone to be able to access the document, select the “public on the web” visibility option. The Google Drive documentation has full details on sharing.

Once your document is added to Google+ anyone with permission to do so will see thumbnails for your shared documents or music files, and there’s an inline player for videos and presentations.

The sharing features work the other way was well — you can paste a Google Drive URL into a Google+ post and anyone looking at the feed will see the same thumbnails and players.

File Under: Web Services

Gmail Takes a Page From the Desktop for New Compose Features

Gmail’s new compose window. Image: Google

Google is introducing a new way to compose messages in Gmail. Instead of loading a whole new “compose” page, you can now start a new email from wherever you are in a popup window. The window isn’t actually a new browser window, but rather an overlay on the Gmail page. The new compose looks like a Gmail chat window, though the compose version is a bit bigger.

The new compose window is rolling out as a preview today. If you’d like to try it out just click the compose button and Gmail will ask if you’d like to try the “new compose experience.” Hit that link and you’ll get the new window.

The change makes it easier to reference old emails while you’re composing a new one, since you don’t need to leave whatever page you’re viewing just to write a new message.

The overlay window also means you can search or keep an eye on incoming mail while you write your new message. Having compose in its own window also means you can write multiple messages at once and even minimize a message to finish it later.

The window within a window model mimics what you’d find on traditional desktop mail apps, and Gmail has also borrowed another feature of desktop mail applications — drag and drop “address chips.” The drag and drop features are nice, but the “chips” mean that your recipients’ email addresses are collapsed to just the name, which can be annoying if you need to double-check that you’re emailing, for example, a person’s work address instead of a home address.

For now the new compose window is optional, but Google says that it will, after some “finishing touches,” be rolling out to everyone “over the coming months.”

[Update: If you really like the new compose window, Google Operating System's Alex Chitu points out that, with a little URL hacking, you can open any message in a compose-style window. Check out Google Operating System for full details.]