<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >

<channel>
    <title>Webmonkey &#187; general</title>
    <atom:link href="http://www.webmonkey.com/tag/general/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <link>http://www.webmonkey.com</link>
    <description>The Web Developer&#039;s Resource</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 17:29:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
    
    <item>
        <title>Learn About Learning Curves</title>
        <link>http://www.webmonkey.com/2008/04/learn_about_learning_curves/</link>
        <comments>http://www.webmonkey.com/2008/04/learn_about_learning_curves/#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>

                <dc:creator>Paul Adams</dc:creator>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/learnaboutlea</guid>
        		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
        <description><![CDATA[In colloquial usage, a &#8220;steep learning curve&#8221; means the knowledge in question takes longer to learn; a &#8220;shallow learning curve&#8221; means it&#8217;s a nice quick process. If you actually plot a learning curve, though, with time on the x axis and understanding on the y axis, you&#8217;ll see that your intuition fails you. A steeper [...]]]></description>

            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- wpautop enabled --><a href="http://blog.wired.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/04/21/learning_curve_title.gif"><img  alt="Learning_curve_title" title="Learning_curve_title" src="http://blog.wired.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/04/21/learning_curve_title.gif" border="0" style="float: right; margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px;" /></a><br />
In colloquial usage, a &#8220;steep learning curve&#8221; means the knowledge in question takes longer to learn; a &#8220;shallow learning curve&#8221; means it&#8217;s a nice quick process.</p>
<p>If you actually plot a learning curve, though, with time on the <em>x </em>axis and understanding on the <em>y</em> axis, you&#8217;ll see that your intuition fails you. A steeper curve indicates quicker learning, and the converse.</p>
<p>This has been a thorn in my pedantic side for a while, but I haven&#8217;t done anything about it. Finally, Rob of Cockeyed.com <a href="http://cockeyed.com/lessons/learning_curve/learning_curve.php">has</a>. Let this be a lesson to everyone.</p>
<div id='linker_widget' class='contextly-widget'></div>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmonkey.com/2008/04/learn_about_learning_curves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
        <slash:comments>9</slash:comments>

        
    </item>
    
    <item>
        <title>Compiler Has Been Nominated for a Webby Award</title>
        <link>http://www.webmonkey.com/2008/04/compiler_has_been_nominated_for_a_webby_award/</link>
        <comments>http://www.webmonkey.com/2008/04/compiler_has_been_nominated_for_a_webby_award/#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:20:26 +0000</pubDate>

                <dc:creator>Michael Calore</dc:creator>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/compilerhasbe</guid>
        		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
        <description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m still trying to wrap my head around this even as I&#8217;m typing it, but the Compiler blog has been nominated for a Webby Award. OMG HFS, indeed! We are an official nominee in the IT Hardware/Software category of the 12th Annual Webbys. And we&#8217;re not alone &#8212; Wired has been nominated for a total [...]]]></description>

            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- wpautop enabled -->
<p><a href="http://blog.wired.com/.shared/image.html?/photos/uncategorized/2008/04/08/webby_logo.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href, '_blank', 'width=709,height=421,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img width="200" height="118" border="0" alt="Webby_logo" title="Webby_logo" src="http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/images/2008/04/08/webby_logo.jpg" style="margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px; float: right;" /></a><br />
I&#8217;m still trying to wrap my head around this even as I&#8217;m typing it, but <strong>the Compiler blog has been nominated for a Webby Award</strong>. OMG HFS, indeed!</p>
<p>We are an official nominee in the <a href="http://www.webbyawards.com/webbys/current.php?season=12#webby_entry_it_hardware ">IT Hardware/Software category</a> of the 12th Annual Webbys. And we&#8217;re not alone &#8212; Wired has been nominated for a total of six Webbys: Wired.com for best news site, best copywriting and best home page, Danger Room for political blog, Game|Life for games-related website and Compiler for software website. Epicenter and Gadget Lab were also designated &quot;Honorees&quot; in the business and culture categories, respectively.* Check out all of this year&#8217;s nominees at <a href="http://www.webbyawards.com/webbys/current.php?season=12 ">webbyawards.com</a>.</p>
<p>Compiler is also currently leading the People&#8217;s Voice vote in the Software/Hardware website category. Of course, we&#8217;re heartily encouraging you to <a href="http://pv.webbyawards.com/">go to the People&#8217;s Voice website</a> and help keep us on top &#8212; so please cast your vote now! To find us, go to the Marketplace section, then expand the Software/Hardware category. Free registration is required, and you can vote once in each category. (Did we mention the other five awards Wired is up for?) Winners will be announced May 6th.</p>
<p>This is huge news for us. It not only represents Compiler&#8217;s first ever nomination for a major industry award, but it&#8217;s a validation of all the hard work we&#8217;ve been doing over the last few years. </p>
<p>This Webby nod also comes hot on the heels of Wired&#8217;s win for Best Classic Website at last month&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.wired.com/underwire/2008/03/sxsw-its-the-we.html">SXSWi Web Awards</a>. It&#8217;s been a great year so far. A huge thanks to all of our supporters, the other nominees and everyone with a pulse and a valid e-mail address who cast a vote in our favor. Cheers.</p>
<p><em><span style="font-size: 0.6em;">* We should also mention that Wired is a <a href="http://www.webbyawards.com/sponsors/">Media Sponsor</a> of the Webbys, along with Variety, Reuters and Adweek. Our relationship with them in no way influences the voting or the promotion of the event. In fact, the only reason I knew we&#8217;re a sponsor is because I saw our logo flash by on the Webbys site right now &#8212; I&#8217;m running FF3b5 and haven&#8217;t activated AdBlock Plus yet. No funny stuff, I swear!</span></em></p>
<div id='linker_widget' class='contextly-widget'></div>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmonkey.com/2008/04/compiler_has_been_nominated_for_a_webby_award/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
        <slash:comments>5</slash:comments>

        
    </item>
    
    <item>
        <title>Give Us Your Data! Take Our Compiler Reader Survey</title>
        <link>http://www.webmonkey.com/2008/03/give_us_your_data_take_our_compiler_reader_survey/</link>
        <comments>http://www.webmonkey.com/2008/03/give_us_your_data_take_our_compiler_reader_survey/#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:05:22 +0000</pubDate>

                <dc:creator>Scott Gilbertson</dc:creator>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/giveusyourda</guid>
        		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
        <description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re always ones to argue for more data portability on the internet, so we&#8217;d like to take this opportunity to humbly ask that you, our readers, port some of your data over to us. We&#8217;re trying to get a better idea of who you are and what you like to do &#8212; more than your [...]]]></description>

            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- wpautop enabled -->
<p><a href="http://condenast.inquisiteasp.com/cgi-bin/qwebcorporate.dll?idx=EKZSNX&amp;amp;pr" border="0"><img border="0" alt="Compiler_survey" title="Compiler_survey" src="http://blog.wired.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/03/12/compiler_survey.jpg" style="margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px; float: right;" /></a><br />
We&#8217;re always ones to argue for more data portability on the internet, so we&#8217;d like to take this opportunity to humbly ask that you, our readers, port some of your data over to us.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re trying to get a better idea of who you are and what you like to do &#8212; more than your thoughtfully-written comments can tell us, anyway. So, we&#8217;ve crafted a little questionnaire. <a href="http://condenast.inquisiteasp.com/cgi-bin/qwebcorporate.dll?idx=EKZSNX&amp;amp;pr">Click here to take our Compiler reader survey</a>. We&#8217;ve kept it as painless as possible. It&#8217;s just two pages and it takes about a minute or so to complete. Everything is totally anonymous.</p>
<p>Most of it is the standard reader survey stuff (did we mention it&#8217;s fast and anonymous?), but when you&#8217;re done, we&#8217;ll have a better understanding of each other. And really, isn&#8217;t that reason enough?</p>
<div id='linker_widget' class='contextly-widget'></div>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmonkey.com/2008/03/give_us_your_data_take_our_compiler_reader_survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>

        
    </item>
    
    <item>
        <title>Internet Address Upgrade Creates More Tubes</title>
        <link>http://www.webmonkey.com/2008/02/internet_address_upgrade_creates_more_tubes/</link>
        <comments>http://www.webmonkey.com/2008/02/internet_address_upgrade_creates_more_tubes/#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 18:08:57 +0000</pubDate>

                <dc:creator>Scott Gilbertson</dc:creator>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/internetaddres</guid>
        		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
        <description><![CDATA[Today marks the start of a huge overhaul to the internet&#8217;s underlying address system. The master address books for the web are beginning to update to a new format known as IP version 6. While you and I use names, like Wired.com or Google.com, to move around the web, our computers use numbers &#8212; translating [...]]]></description>

            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- wpautop enabled -->
<p><img class="blogimg" src="http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites//seriesoftubes.jpg" alt="seriesoftubes.jpg" border="0" width="174" height="147" style="float: right; margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px;" />Today marks the start of a huge overhaul to the internet&#8217;s underlying address system. The master address books for the web are beginning to update to a new format known as IP version 6.</p>
<p>While you and I use names, like Wired.com or Google.com, to move around the web, our computers use numbers &mdash; translating from words to numbers so that we don&#8217;t have to remember the actual numerical address of the sites we&#8217;re visiting.</p>
<p>The bad news that the web grew much faster than expected. The current addressing system, IPv4, will exhaust the pool of possibilities by 2011.</p>
<p><span id="more-9092"></span></p>
<p>With <a href="http://www.ipv6.org/">IPv6</a> the internet will have what amounts to a never-ending number of addresses. IPv6 offers a number of other advantages over version 4, including simplified routing aggregation and address auto-configuration as well as integrated encryption capabilities.</p>
<p>The downside is that some time in the next decade or so, which is expected timeframe for the full transition to IPv6, you may have to upgrade your router and possibly change your home network setup. Apple&#8217;s Mac OS X has supported IPv6 since 2006, and Windows Vista also supports IPv6, but many older systems don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7221758.stm">BBC</a>, photo credit <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/orinrobertjohn/2188279587/">Orin Optiglot, Flickr</a>]</p>
<div id='linker_widget' class='contextly-widget'></div>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmonkey.com/2008/02/internet_address_upgrade_creates_more_tubes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>

        
    </item>
    
    <item>
        <title>Does Digital Piracy Mean Innovation is Coming?</title>
        <link>http://www.webmonkey.com/2008/01/does_digital_piracy_mean_innovation_is_coming/</link>
        <comments>http://www.webmonkey.com/2008/01/does_digital_piracy_mean_innovation_is_coming/#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:25:03 +0000</pubDate>

                <dc:creator>Scott Gilbertson</dc:creator>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/doesdigitalpi</guid>
        		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
        <description><![CDATA[Not convinced by with our earlier post about licensing your content in the public domain as Tantek ???elik advocates? Then consider The Pirate&#8217;s Dilemma a new book that argues we need to re-think our entire approach to copyright, content and ownership. Matt Mason, author of The Pirate&#8217;s Dilemma, has a short article up over at [...]]]></description>

            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- wpautop enabled -->
<p><img class="blogimg" src="http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites//pirates.jpg" alt="pirates.jpg" border="0" width="166" height="246" style="float: right; margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px;" />Not convinced by with our <a href="http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2008/01/creating-propri.html">earlier post</a> about licensing your content in the public domain as Tantek ???elik advocates? Then consider <a href="http://thepiratesdilemma.com/"><cite>The Pirate&#8217;s Dilemma</cite></a> a new book that argues we need to re-think our entire approach to copyright, content and ownership.</p>
<p>Matt Mason, author of <cite>The Pirate&#8217;s Dilemma</cite>, has a <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/the-pirates-dilemma-080108/">short article</a> up over at Torrent Freak which highlights some of what he claims are the book&#8217;s core ideas, including the notion that piracy is often a  precursor to innovation (a kind of twist on the old idea that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery).</p>
<p><span id="more-8312"></span></p>
<p>Regardless of whether you&#8217;re in line with our earlier piece suggesting that we might all be better off if no one owned content or you&#8217;re a die-hard supporter of copyright in all its current forms, Mason&#8217;s article is a thought provoking read. Here&#8217;s one excerpt worth noting:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>We live in a world where it is legal for a company to patent pigs, or any other living thing except for a full birth human being, but copying a CD you bought onto your hard drive is considered an infringement of someone else&#8217;s rights. A place where an average law abiding citizen could owe more than $12 million dollars in fines if they were sued every time they accidentally violated copyright law in a single day. A society where it&#8217;s ok for each of us to be hit with 5,000 advertising messages every 24 hours, usually without our permission, but creating a piece of art and placing it in public yourself without permission can land you in prison. This isn&#8217;t just about the pros and cons of file sharing &#8211; this is about an entire species losing its sense of perspective, failing to understand the potential of one of its most precious (and yet most abundant) resources.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It certainly sounds like an interesting book and somehow it seems only fitting to download it via your favorite BitTorrent site.</p>
<p><strong>See Also:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2008/01/creating-propri.html#previouspost"><br />
Creating Proprietary Content is Like &#8216;Writing in Sand&#8217;</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2008/01/learning-from-p.html#previouspost">Learning From Plaxo/Facebook: You are not Your E-Mail</a></li>
</ul>
<div id='linker_widget' class='contextly-widget'></div>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmonkey.com/2008/01/does_digital_piracy_mean_innovation_is_coming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>

        
    </item>
    
    <item>
        <title>Happy Thanksgiving from Compiler</title>
        <link>http://www.webmonkey.com/2007/11/happy_thanksgiving_from_compiler/</link>
        <comments>http://www.webmonkey.com/2007/11/happy_thanksgiving_from_compiler/#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:02:01 +0000</pubDate>

                <dc:creator>Michael Calore</dc:creator>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/happythanksgiv</guid>
        		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
        <description><![CDATA[The Compiler crew will be taking the rest of the week off, resuming our regular coverage on Monday November 26. How are we spending our holidays, you ask? Scott&#8217;s busy scouting locations in the Smoky Mountains for an epic machinima Civil War drama starring the voice talents of Judd Nelson and Leonard Nimoy. I (Mike) [...]]]></description>

            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- wpautop enabled -->
<p><a href="http://blog.wired.com/.shared/image.html?/photos/uncategorized/2007/11/21/wildturkey.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href, '_blank', 'width=800,height=600,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img width="300" height="225" border="0" alt="Wildturkey" title="Wildturkey" src="http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/images/2007/11/21/wildturkey.jpg" style="margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px; float: right;" /></a><br />
The Compiler crew will be taking the rest of the week off, resuming our regular coverage on Monday November 26.</p>
<p>How are we spending our holidays, you ask? Scott&#8217;s busy scouting locations in the Smoky Mountains for an epic machinima Civil War drama starring the voice talents of Judd Nelson and Leonard Nimoy. I (Mike) will stay at home &#8212; I&#8217;m trying to figure out how to get <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zfs">ZFS</a> running on my first-gen iPod shuffle. If that doesn&#8217;t work, I&#8217;ll probably just put some Les Rallizes Denudes on it and walk around San Francisco instead. </p>
<p>Feel free to send us tips over the weekend in case we get the urge to blog. Otherwise, be excellent to each other and we&#8217;ll see you next week.</p>
<p>Photo of &quot;the dirty bird&quot; by Brave Heart via <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/brraveheart/36044628/">Flickr</a> </p>
<div id='linker_widget' class='contextly-widget'></div>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmonkey.com/2007/11/happy_thanksgiving_from_compiler/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
        <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>

        
    </item>
    
    <item>
        <title>World War II Colossus Computer Resurrected To Crack Codes Once Again</title>
        <link>http://www.webmonkey.com/2007/11/world_war_ii_colossus_computer_resurrected_to_crack_codes_once_again/</link>
        <comments>http://www.webmonkey.com/2007/11/world_war_ii_colossus_computer_resurrected_to_crack_codes_once_again/#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:51:04 +0000</pubDate>

                <dc:creator>Scott Gilbertson</dc:creator>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/worldwariico</guid>
        		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
        <description><![CDATA[The fate of the world may not hang in the balance this time, but a team of engineers have resurrected Bletchley Park&#8217;s famous Colossus computer, the World War II code breaking machine widely recognized as one of the first programmable digital computers. It took fourteen years to reconstruct a Colossus since the machines were meticulously [...]]]></description>

            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- wpautop enabled -->
<p><img class="blogimg" src="http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/images/colossus.jpg" alt="colossus.jpg" border="0" width="189" height="126" style="float: right; margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px;" />The fate of the world may not hang in the balance this time, but a team of engineers have resurrected Bletchley Park&#8217;s famous Colossus computer, the World War II code breaking machine widely recognized as one of the first programmable digital computers. It took fourteen years to reconstruct a Colossus since the machines were meticulously broken apart and destroyed after the war.</p>
<p>A new contest, The Cipher Challenge, will pit the rebuilt Colossus&#8217; code breaking skills against modern machines running Colossus emulators. The contest is part of fund-raising drive for the British National Museum of Computing. </p>
<p>Perhaps the most interesting thing in <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7094881.stm">this BBC article</a> is that Tony Sale, leader of the Colossus rebuilding project, says that &#8220;a virtual Colossus written to run on a Pentium 2 laptop takes about the same time to break a cipher as Colossus does.&#8221;</p>
<p>Now that&#8217;s progress.</p>
<p><span id="more-6572"></span></p>
<p>Actually there&#8217;s pretty good reason for the similar speeds; Colossus was built to do one thing and one thing only, break codes. A modern PC on the other hand, isn&#8217;t optimized for any one task, so while it&#8217;s more versatile (we hear WoW on Colossus is plagued by bad refresh rates) it isn&#8217;t necessarily faster.</p>
<p>Sale and team will find out how their Colossus replica did tomorrow when they get to see the actual unencrypted messages.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;d like more background on Colossus and what it was used for during the war (without it WWII would likely have lasted much much longer), check out the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossus_computer">related Wikipedia article</a>.</p>
<p>[<b>Update:</b><em> Alas, Colossus lost. <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7098005.stm">See the BBC</a> for more details</em>]</p>
<p>[Image from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossus_computer">Wikipedia</a>]</p>
<div id='linker_widget' class='contextly-widget'></div>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmonkey.com/2007/11/world_war_ii_colossus_computer_resurrected_to_crack_codes_once_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>

        
    </item>
    
    <item>
        <title>Avoid The Caps Lock Plague</title>
        <link>http://www.webmonkey.com/2007/10/avoid_the_caps_lock_plague/</link>
        <comments>http://www.webmonkey.com/2007/10/avoid_the_caps_lock_plague/#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:34:44 +0000</pubDate>

                <dc:creator>Scott Gilbertson</dc:creator>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/avoidthecaps</guid>
        		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software & Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
        <description><![CDATA[Gadget Lab posted this morning on a recently discovered anti-caps lock feature on new Mac keyboards. Essentially the new keyboards make it easy to avoid accidentally triggering the caps lock key by forcing a time delay on the keystroke. That&#8217;s a great feature, given our long-standing dislike of the caps lock key, but since the [...]]]></description>

            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- wpautop enabled -->
<p><img class="blogimg" src="http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/images/capslock.jpg" alt="capslock.jpg" border="0" width="183" height="126" style="float: right; margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px;" />Gadget Lab posted this morning on a recently discovered <a href="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2007/10/apple-keyboard-.html">anti-caps lock feature</a> on new Mac keyboards. Essentially the new keyboards make it easy to avoid accidentally triggering the caps lock key by forcing a time delay on the keystroke.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a great feature, given our <a href="http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2006/08/71606">long-standing dislike</a> of the caps lock key, but since the caps lock key is essentially useless &mdash; comment trolls and some programming languages not withstanding &mdash; why not just remap the key to something more useful?</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve got a Mac and you&#8217;d like to re-map the caps lock key to something more useful &mdash; say crtl or cmd &mdash; check out the freeware utility <a href="http://doublecommand.sourceforge.net/">Double Command</a>, which allows you to re-map all sort of keys into more useful functions.</p>
<p><span id="more-4572"></span></p>
<p>We reviewed Double Command earlier this year and not a lot has changed so I&#8217;ll just point you to the <a href="http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2007/01/macmonth_double.html">previous write up</a>. And keep in mind that, if you don&#8217;t have the new Apple keyboard, but you&#8217;d like to avoid accidentally hitting caps lock and having to re-type your sentence, Double Command can, at the very least, just re-map it to a normal shift key.</p>
<p>If you know of similar solutions for Windows and Linux, let us know in the comments</p>
<p><strong>See Also:</strong><br/></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2007/01/macmonth_double.html#previouspost">MacMonth: Double Command</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2006/12/do_we_need_a_be.html#previouspost">Do We Need A Better NSFW Indicator?</a></li>
</ul>
<div id='linker_widget' class='contextly-widget'></div>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmonkey.com/2007/10/avoid_the_caps_lock_plague/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>

        
    </item>
    
    <item>
        <title>Hidelinks: Keep Your Bookmarks Safe From Prying Eyes</title>
        <link>http://www.webmonkey.com/2007/09/hidelinks_keep_your_bookmarks_safe_from_prying_eyes/</link>
        <comments>http://www.webmonkey.com/2007/09/hidelinks_keep_your_bookmarks_safe_from_prying_eyes/#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:27:28 +0000</pubDate>

                <dc:creator>Michael Calore</dc:creator>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/hidelinkskeep</guid>
        		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
        <description><![CDATA[Long URLs are a pain, which is my the many URL shortening services cropped up a few years back, but what if you want a short URL and you want to keep prying eyes out of your bookmarks? That&#8217;s the scenario behind Hidelinks, a new service that offers a shortened URL and the option to [...]]]></description>

            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- wpautop enabled -->
<p><img class="blogimg" src="http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/images/hidelinks.jpg" alt="hidelinks.jpg" border="0" width="115" height="110" style="float: right; margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px;" />Long URLs are a pain, which is my the many URL shortening services cropped up a few years back, but what if you want a short URL and you want to keep prying eyes out of your bookmarks? That&#8217;s the scenario behind <a href="http://www.hidelinks.com/hidelinks/default.asp">Hidelinks</a>, a new service that offers a shortened URL and the option to lock it with a password.</p>
<p>The service is dead simple to use, just head to the site and paste in the URL you want shortened. Then enter a password and it hit the &#8220;Shorten Link&#8221; button. Hidelinks will spit out a shortened link which you can copy to the clipboard or bookmark in your browser.</p>
<p>When someone tries to access the URL using the link, they&#8217;ll be asked for the password before they are permitted to see the page. For instance, here&#8217;s a link to <a href="http://www.hidelinks.com/?ckmwccjpm7">Compiler</a> generated with Hidelinks (the password is &#8220;wired&#8221;).</p>
<p><span id="more-37962"></span></p>
<p>If you have nosy co-workers or have to share computer access with other people, this is an effective way to hide your bookmarks from them. </p>
<p>The main drawback is that, if you&#8217;re bookmarking these links in a browser, it&#8217;s impossible to know what site they actually lead to, which makes for a confusing bookmarks folder. Of course most people probably don&#8217;t have too many sites they want to hide, so maybe that isn&#8217;t a problem.</p>
<p>Hidelinks also offers free accounts if you&#8217;d like to use the site as a bookmarking service.</p>
<p><strong>See Also:</strong><br/></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2007/04/firefox_tip_url.html#previouspost">Firefox Tip: URL Shortcuts Made Easy</a></li>
</ul>
<div id='linker_widget' class='contextly-widget'></div>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmonkey.com/2007/09/hidelinks_keep_your_bookmarks_safe_from_prying_eyes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>

        
    </item>
    
    <item>
        <title>Gray Lady Gives It Away</title>
        <link>http://www.webmonkey.com/2007/09/gray_lady_gives_it_away/</link>
        <comments>http://www.webmonkey.com/2007/09/gray_lady_gives_it_away/#comments</comments>
        <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:14:53 +0000</pubDate>

                <dc:creator>Michael Calore</dc:creator>

        <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/grayladygives</guid>
        		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
        <description><![CDATA[The New York Times announced yesterday that it is opening up the premium Times Select portion of the site to the general public. First launched in 2005, Times Select followed the standard, outdated approach to putting print news on the web &#8212; it charged viewers a subscription fee. Apparently someone over at the Times has [...]]]></description>

            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- wpautop enabled -->
<p><img class="blogimg" src="http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/images/nyt.jpg" alt="nyt.jpg" border="0" width="345" height="73" style="float: right; margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px;" />The New York Times announced yesterday that it is opening up the premium Times Select portion of the site to the general public. First launched in 2005, Times Select followed the standard, outdated approach to putting print news on the web &mdash; it charged viewers a subscription fee.</p>
<p>Apparently someone over at the Times has finally realized what the rest of the internet had figured out long before Times Select first launched: thars money in them thar ads. Not that Times will admit it was wrong, a spokesperson tells <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-new-york-times-to-close-timesselect-effective-wednesday/">PaidContent.org</a> &#8220;This is what is really important &mdash; it did work. It&#8217;s just a matter of as compared to what.&#8221; </p>
<p>In other words, Times Select was so successful they changed the entire business model.</p>
<p><span id="more-37502"></span></p>
<p>The truth is, while Times Select might have made a little money, the Times is doing away with the subscription service because serving ads on the same pages will generate massively more revenue &mdash; giving it away works. </p>
<p>As part of the announcement, the Times&#8217; archives from the past 20 years, as well as the public domain years of 1851-1922, are also now freely available to the general public. Some of the articles from those gap years between 1923-1986 will also be available for free, though it&#8217;s difficult to tell which ones based on the announcement.</p>
<p>Times Reader and the premium crossword service will remain paid services. </p>
<div id='linker_widget' class='contextly-widget'></div>]]></content:encoded>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmonkey.com/2007/09/gray_lady_gives_it_away/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>

        
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
